How Actor Amber Tamblyn Created Her Own Role: Feminist Activist

LISTEN ON: APPLE PODCASTS | STITCHER | PANDORA | SPOTIFY | NPR ONE | MORE

In this episode we’ll hear how Amber Tamblyn went from being an actress to being an activist--defining her own role in the feminist movement--and how we can all play a role in leading change.  Amber's  book is called "Era of Ignition: Coming of Age in a Time of Rage and Revolution." It's part memoir, part manifesto, part call to action. We sat down together in San Francisco while she was in town as part of the release of her book in paperback.

Back in 2017, Amber wrote an OpEd for the NYTimes, called "I'm Done With Not Being Believed" in which she tells what happened when a well-known actor almost as old as her dad tried to pick her up when she was 16, and then called her a liar when she outed him on Twitter. This was before the Weinstein revelations, before the #MeToo movement caught fire and before Times Up, which Amber went on to co-found.


TRANSCRIPT. We do our best, please forgive or let us know any errors.

Lauren Schiller:

Do you remember there was an op-ed that came out a few years ago in the New York Times and the headline was, I'm done with not being believed. It was before the Weinstein revelations, before Me Too, before Time's Up. But just after Trump's grab them by the pussy tape. It was written by...

Amber Tamblyn:

My name is Amber Tamblyn, and I am an author, actress, director, producer. I am many things.

Lauren Schiller:

By the time Amber wrote this op-ed, she'd been acting for over 20 years since she was 11. You might know her from General Hospital, Sisterhood of The Traveling Pants, Joan of Arcadia. She also directed the movie Painted Black, and has published a novel and several books of poetry.

Lauren Schiller:

In this op-ed, She tells what happened when a well-known actor, almost as old as her dad tried to pick her up when she was 16 and then called her a liar when she outed him on Twitter.

Amber Tamblyn:

And so I wrote the piece which really looked at that exact idea, which was that I was really, really, really effing done with not being believed, with being told that my story was not going to matter, that it was always going to be, "Let's not believe her first. And let's believe him First," just because that's the narrative. That's the way things go.

Lauren Schiller:

After the piece came out, Amber attended a Hollywood party. She'd been to many times before, filled with bold face names.

Amber Tamblyn:

So many people in our industry, not only incredibly famous, but powerful, really powerful executives, women who run companies who I've never talked to who I would normally never really not have an interaction with, coming up to tell me how much that piece meant and many of them sharing some stories.

Amber Tamblyn:

That was the part that I didn't really realize... I mean, I knew that it had sort of set this fire on everyone reading it on social media and in that world. But that was a really powerful evening in which I sensed that something was coming.

Lauren Schiller:

And then in quick succession, we all learned about Harvey Weinstein, felt the full force of the Me Too movement, and saw the creation of Times Up of which Amber is a founding member.

Amber Tamblyn:

And now we've seen in so many ways, especially with these incredible silence breaker women who have come forward and testified and given their stories about what Weinstein did, but not only that, not only the violence, but the silencing and the stalking and hiring these companies to follow them and plant evidence against them and everything that's happened. You understand how far predominantly men in positions of power will go to keep us quiet and away from that power. So, to me it was it struck such a nerve and it just felt like an opening.

Lauren Schiller:

In the wake of all this, Amber wrote a book called Era of Ignition: Coming of Age in a Time of Rage and Revolution, which is part memoir, part manifesto and part call to action.

Lauren Schiller:

We sat down together in San Francisco while she was in town as part of the release of her book in paperback. I'm Lauren Schiller. This is Inflection Point, the stories of how women rise up.

Lauren Schiller:

Today we'll hear how Amber Tamblyn went from being an actress to being an activist, defining her own role in the feminist movement and how we can all play a role in leading change. We'll be right back.

Lauren Schiller:

I'm back with Amber Tamblyn. I'm curious about how you got into acting in the first place at such a young age. And how that shaped your view of yourself, your sense of yourself.

Amber Tamblyn:

This question has always been a very easy answer for me since I was very young. I had a stump speech that I was able to give. My dad who was in West Side Story, his agent saw me when I was in a play when I was very young and she said, "We've got to get her into acting."

Amber Tamblyn:

And I went on some auditions and I got a role when I was 11 on a soap opera. I had a stump speech version of that answer for a very long time. And I think it wasn't until I hit my own, to use the phrase Era of Ignition and my own sort of existential crisis that propelled me into the person I am today. Did that question become very complicated and require much deeper thought and explanation?

Amber Tamblyn:

Because I don't know when you are a child, if you are choosing to act, you're not making that choice to yourself. Adults around you are making that choice. And it's taken me a long time to think about what I lost in the course of that what you lose as a child who is not only working for a living and taking care of your family for a living, but also playing other people for a living, taking on the personalities of other people, telling your body on a daily basis from one part to the next. Today you're having a heroin overdose. Today you're raped. Today you've been murdered today. You're crying all day today. You're incredibly happy. It takes its toll.

Amber Tamblyn:

So I don't know how much choice really ever came into that part of it for me, but it's certainly been... it's a story. My story is not one I would change for anything in the worlds because it has produced the person that I am today.

Lauren Schiller:

Well, it's interesting all those roles that you just reeled off, none of them were of powerful women or girls taking charge or even, I mean, any of the roles that were sort of starting to see today. I mean, how did that make you feel about yourself? I mean and even did at the time how you felt about yourself? Or is it really only kind of in hindsight that you could reflect on that?

Amber Tamblyn:

I think as a young woman, I had many of the same frustrations that I couldn't pinpoint, or put a reason behind the way that many women do or have in their given fields in their industries. A sense of being emotionally extorted, a sense of having your value, not feel seen or utilized a sense of there is something greater for you. There is something bigger for you, a calling that you don't know how to manifest for yourself though it's there, it exists.

Amber Tamblyn:

That's universal. That is every woman's experience. That is my mom who's a retired school teacher of three decades. That's her experience. And my grandmother who was a piano teacher and vocal coach and it just every woman I know has had that at some degree.

Amber Tamblyn:

So I think it's, right now we're going through this really, really wonderful time in the entertainment business where things are not feeling like they're going as fast as they should be as far as change is concerned. But still at the same time, you are seeing an unprecedented number of women and people of color and voices that have traditionally been left out of artistic, cultural point of view, now becoming very much a part of that landscape both in television and film.

Amber Tamblyn:

Not as much as I would like and that many would like, but a lot more than before. And so there is a real... it's very bittersweet for me. because I went through a time where like the women who came before me, all of them were speaking out was really dangerous and where it didn't matter how good the movie is that you made or directed or poured your guts and life into and the reviews, how fantastic they were. It didn't matter.

Amber Tamblyn:

You were still going to be seen as less than, and therefore your work was going to be seen and valued as less than. But I think we're kind of in a different space now. I feel that. Again, with the caveat, not as much as I would hope, but we're getting there.

Lauren Schiller:

Yeah. I mean, one of the things that I'm learning is that change is just a lot freaking slower that I would like it to be. Sounds like you might like it to be as well, especially when you really start to recognize the problems and put your fingers on the problems. And then its like, "Well, what's taking so long? Why can't we just fix that right now?"

Amber Tamblyn:

Yeah, I mean Rome wasn't burned to the ground and built back up in a day and it takes a minute. It really takes a minute to... we're still in the phase of people trying to get on board. We are still in the backlash phase. You have to remember that we are literally dismantling something that dates back to the Bible, that dates back to Roman Empire to all the ways in which women have ever tried to gain access or use their voice for a platform or find themselves in a position of power and have found themselves shut out. We are trying to dismantle thousands and thousands of years of that and you can't do it overnight.

Amber Tamblyn:

It's just not going to happen and it has to be slow, and it's going to take time. And what I always say to people is the most important thing is that we practice patience and perseverance. Those two things together. Because what we can't do is get frustrated and back off and go, this isn't working, we're still getting attacked, we're still being silenced. These things are still happening and go be upset about that. I mean, you could be upset about it, but we have to keep moving. We have to keep pushing forward.

Lauren Schiller:

Well, in some ways, seeing the news that comes out every day about the latest egregious a front it is frustrating, but it's also a good thing, right? Because we weren't necessarily hearing about these things before on the front page of the newspaper.

Amber Tamblyn:

I'll give you a great example of that. That's actually really smart that you brought that up because for instance, even if you look at the Academy Award nominations this year in 2020 and with full transparency, I am one of the Academy voters. I was one of the many women and people that they brought in and this huge attempt to try to balance out their membership and make it more representative and diverse.

Amber Tamblyn:

And even still, you see no women directors nominated, you see women's sort of shut out and especially people of color shutout in major categories. But I think it's fascinating and says a lot about where we're at that the conversation about who was shut out was almost more loud and profound and took center stage over who would... who was actually nominated for the Oscars this year. And that's really not something that we have seen before.

Amber Tamblyn:

We've seen outrage here and there about certain things, but the fact that this took center stage, this became the conversation, says a lot and it's really important. That type of a pressure is very important.

Lauren Schiller:

Yeah. One has a vision of, at least when I was growing up like child actors and actresses flameout in their teens and twenties whether they succumb to drug use or alcohol or other forms of self-harm or other people's harming them. And you somehow were able to avoid that fate and in fact grapple with and then get on top of your situation.

Lauren Schiller:

And I'm curious you go into it in your book, Era of Ignition, but I'm curious to just hear how that self-awareness came to be and how you climbed out of it.

Amber Tamblyn:

Well, firstly I would say that it just didn't happen to me publicly. So I think one of the most difficult things to see with young actors and especially actresses, is when this happens to them publicly in their dealing with the combination of their privilege and their sense of having no identity, yet having to be responsible for an identity that that was given to them by a public when they are coming to terms with the realization that they have only been an object for a living at a time in which you are most delicately trying to create your central nervous system and your sense of self and your ID.

Amber Tamblyn:

And so that I think like my two books before this one was a book called Dark Sparkler, which looked at the lives and deaths of child star actresses. And that was a really intense and difficult exorcism for me, looking at all of those young actresses who had died. Again, either at the hands of stalkers or fathers or the things that they did to themselves. But it was an examination, not just of my culture but also I think the sense of my own need to die at a certain level.

Amber Tamblyn:

And not literally, but to have a... I have a real metaphorical death. I was craving an ending to this type of person that I had been for so long, which was not an ending of acting, which I've always loved. It's a great work. But an ending to the not having any control and to not being able to be the bigger version of yourself you had imagined. The person who controls her own content, who writes her own words, who interprets her own art.

Amber Tamblyn:

Those things were not available to me. As they are not for many women and in many different industries. And I think I had to go through my own version of that existential crisis to come out on the other side, which again is something I think all women go through, whether you're in your late 20s or early 30s. It is that Saturn Return, which I talk a lot about in the book.

Amber Tamblyn:

This idea, I call it in the book an Invisible Alphabet, where you are at A or B or C and you see that bright, glowing Z in the distance, but you have no idea how to manifest the alphabet in between. You just have no skill for it.

Amber Tamblyn:

And our culture doesn't give us a skill set for that. It really doesn't, if anything, it tries to keep women distanced from their own potential. So for me, I think it was about feeling like if I didn't come out on the other side, figuring out how to manifest that alphabet that bridge then I wasn't going to survive.

Amber Tamblyn:

So, this was an act of survival for me. And again, this is not me talking about a literal death. This is talking about, I don't know what I would have... where I would have ended up, who I would have been, what kind of career I would have had, if any had I not pushed through and done what I had to do, which didn't feel like a choice. It felt like an act of survival.

Lauren Schiller:

But you had the presence of mind to be able to step back and say, "This is just not working for me." And I'm trying to dig into that. I mean, I love the concept of the Saturn Return and I want to talk about that more because I feel like that happens... It just keeps happening. I mean, I'm older than you and I feel like I'm having that question right now.

Amber Tamblyn:

It's supposed to happen, by the way.

Lauren Schiller:

What is my Z, right? Like I've done all this. I've gotten... maybe let's just say I'm at... what's the middle of the alphabet? L.

Amber Tamblyn:

Like around your T. An S or a T.

Lauren Schiller:

So, just to try and understand how when you have that clarity or that recognition that you do need to start reaching for a different direction.

Amber Tamblyn:

I write again in the book about how much I believe that women have been taught from a very young age, from when we were girls to confuse instinct for anxiety. I think that's very real. And the pit in your stomach, the thing that makes you sick every day that makes you question and then we are just so used to putting that away, is the thing we should be listening to the most.

Amber Tamblyn:

I think there's a great Henry Miller quote that says, "All growth is a leap in the dark." And I believe that to be true at any age. And yes, it's true that a Saturn Return, this reconnecting with your new self and pivoting to whatever that new trajectory of your life is supposed to be happens on a cycle. And it's going to happen to me again and I'm going to be in my forties probably going, "What am I doing? What have I done? What is this life I have built?"

Amber Tamblyn:

And that's the journey. I mean that is the finding the joy in that darkness and the excavation of that darkness, not shying away from it is where I have learned to find power. I think that is what some people would call, "The leaning in." There is many different ways of looking at it, but I really think it's important for us, especially as women to find safety and comfort and growth from leaning into those dark, painful questions.

Lauren Schiller:

Yeah. Leaning in started again kind of a bad rap, but it really is the right term because of-

Amber Tamblyn:

I don't know. Yeah.

Lauren Schiller:

... moving back from you really need to push into it.

Amber Tamblyn:

I don't know much about that or the author who wrote it. I know that it was controversial because I think it was also... it comes with that same cliché of like women can have it all, that's not really what the question is. The question is, are women allowed to be? Period.

Amber Tamblyn:

Are we allowed to be? And does that mean... and if we are allowed to be, are we supposed to be this version of ourselves? Are we supposed to sound like this version of ourselves? Are we supposed to act like this version of ourselves? Who is controlling the narrative of how women are allowed to show up in their own lives and be powerful?

Amber Tamblyn:

And that is the age old question that seems to at every level continue to be a huge underlying problem. I mean, we're even seeing it now in the 2020 elections still, this idea of who is electable, who isn't, who is trustworthy and who isn't. I mean the afterword in this book that I wrote in Era of Ignition, I wrote it maybe six months ago and when I read it the other night at the book release party for this.

Amber Tamblyn:

I did this wonderful in conversation with a journalist, Jodi Kantor. And as I was reading it, I had to pause and like address to the audience and say, "This is scary how relevant this is right now." And it will always be relevant and tell we are having those deeper, more difficult conversations about why this continues to happen, about why we can't even agree on a definition of what misogyny or sexism is before addressing how to fix it.

Amber Tamblyn:

We are putting... we are just continually putting Band-Aids over things instead of dealing with the wound.

Lauren Schiller:

Well, before we get too far away from this, could you explain this... Your concept of the Saturn Return? I mean folks can read the book but let's give them a little taste of what, what do you meant.

Amber Tamblyn:

Well, the argument that I make in the book and the title I should, I guess I should talk a little bit. The title really to me is talking about this condensed time of palpable rage and frustration that we are all feeling that has propelled us into uncontrollable action.

Amber Tamblyn:

This sense of we're not going to wait for permission anymore. We are going to do, which is very much what Me Too and Time's Up have done over the last several years. But the book really looks at my own trajectory and my experience going from being a child actress who felt very much out of control over her own trajectory in life, and felt like she had been pigeonholed into this one area in which she could only go into other people's rooms, step into the threshold of other people's art and interpret their work without ever having her voice be a part of that interpretation.

Amber Tamblyn:

And the book chronicles my experience, learning how to forget about that room and that door and just build my own damn house, and my own space and my own room in which to exist and be, which is dangerous and scary and doesn't always work. That's sort of the micro look of the book while looking at the macro, which is the world we're living in is sort of having its own Era of Ignition as well.

Amber Tamblyn:

It is also having this Saturn's return, this idea that every 20 to 30 years, we are coming back to a space of beginning for ourselves, which very much is without going into like a deep thing about astrology. And about the way planets are aligned. We can maybe agree, maybe not. It might be philosophical, it might be spiritual, but agree that each of us are uniquely born in the moment we are born, the universe and planets are aligned in a certain way.

Amber Tamblyn:

I am not so narcissistic and egotistical to say, "I know what those planets, what that any of that means." But I believe that each of us have a unique story to tell. And therefore some of that might have something to do with this idea that we... our subconscious and our conscious mind and our spiritual living come into this state of crisis at certain points in our life at very pivotal points in our life.

Amber Tamblyn:

And I think that the country is in one of those existential crises right now. And so my argument is to always... and in this book is to not be afraid of it, is to lean into the darkness as we talked about. And to go for what is most uncomfortable because that is how things are going to change.

Amber Tamblyn:

All these conversations that terrify you about race and white feminism and are men being canceled too quickly, anything that you can feel you are having a tough time with as a woman, as a man, as a non-binary person, no matter where you come from, it is good that this conversation is happening.

Amber Tamblyn:

It is good that these things are coming up and bubbling up to the surface so that we can address them and address them with fear. That's okay, but to not shy away and pull away from this change, which we have all demanded and now it's here.

Amber Tamblyn:

So we have to push forward and go through that. So the book looks a little bit both at how to move through the world in this change that we're in, in this momentum, in the chaos of it. How to resensitize ourselves to these very tough conversations in which we've wanted to just be numb and give a bland answer, an easy answer, but how to truly engage with people around us and in our communities and therefore truly engage with ourselves in our own lives and re stimulating who we are, and who we are allowed to become, what our trajectory means.

Lauren Schiller:

Yeah. Well, you... I mean you did that so boldly and this is when I really first became aware of you in this Op-ed that you wrote in 2017. But this was before the Weinstein thing, right?

Amber Tamblyn:

It was about two months before the Weinstein article came out, which is one of the reasons, and I chronicle this deeply in the book about how Jodi Kantor had reached out to me because so many women had after reading that Op-ed, and that's when I really understood that this was part of the zeitgeist, the rage zeitgeists and that it was bubbling and it was right under the surface. And all Trump did is like put the village idiots pin in it and it popped. And that's what happened. Yeah.

Lauren Schiller:

Yeah. Share with what the gist of the op-ed was. And I do encourage everyone who's listening to this to go back and read it. because it was, for me, going back and reading it again so prescient. I mean, clearly a lot of events were leading up to that moment, but I hadn't really seen or heard anyone just put a stake in the ground like you did at that time.

Lauren Schiller:

And then it felt like everything was cascading out of that in society, but then apparently also personally for you.

Amber Tamblyn:

So the short of that, op-ed came from a small Twitter exchange that happened online whereby I said something about James Woods picking up on me. The actor James was picking up on me once when I was 16. And of course, it became this huge firestorm. James Wood denied it, put out this thing in like the Hollywood Reporter or something. He was calling me a liar.

Amber Tamblyn:

And that was sort of the moment in which all of the James Woods's is before him. All of the men who have ever called women liars. For instance, most recently I would even look at Bernie Sanders essentially saying that Elizabeth Warren lied about this interaction they had. It is part of a narrative that women have always had to face. It is part of this idea that our stories cannot be trusted and therefore we cannot be trusted with power.

Amber Tamblyn:

It really is this logic that has been created by a patriarchal narrative and system that we live in. and it goes around and around and around and it chases it's disgusting tail. And so in that moment that was the survival thing that kicked in. That was the sense of I wasn't going to be quiet. I didn't know what the repercussions would be. And I reached out to my friend Roxanne Gay, the writer and I said, "Will you connect me with your editor at the New York times? I think I have an op-ed for them." And she did and that was it.

Lauren Schiller:

Again, even though it feels like this is so ingrained in our brains. at this point, I really, I had to go back and look at the chronology of things just to get the order of it right. So, your Op-ed comes out sometime in September.

Lauren Schiller:

The Weinstein story breaks sometime in October, a couple of weeks after that, Alyssa Milano tweets the Me Too hashtag, picking up on Toronto Burke's movement that was started in 2006. And then you got involved with a group of women and launched Time's Up in January of 2018. I mean that is really, I mean we talked about change being slow, but that's pretty rapid fire development.

Amber Tamblyn:

That is what I, the term I've coined called angronized, which when women get angry and organized and we were very angronized. That was mega propulsion of energy and being just fed up really, really fed up.

Amber Tamblyn:

And what the experience... and again, I will only speak for my own my personal journey with that was that women were getting in rooms together who had never really been encouraged to be alone in rooms together and talk in the entertainment business. You had very famous women like Reese Witherspoon, and that's not me speaking out of terms.

Amber Tamblyn:

Like she's been very much in front of this movement and, and a really wonderful proponent of change and you have America Ferrera and Natalie Portman and you had these women, then in the room with women like me who's not a huge movie star, but known in her own way, in a separate way. And then you had women who were also there, who were agents, who were assistants to agents, who were producers.

Amber Tamblyn:

You had women just from across the landscape and just... and nobody knew what to do. There was no roadmap for this which is what always makes me laugh when I hear people say, ‘Well, the punishment doesn't fit the crime." And my argument is always, well, who invented the punishment for the crime?

Amber Tamblyn:

And we don't know that yet. We are actually in the center of figuring out what fits what now according to this new world we live in. And you don't get to dictate it. And I don't get to dictate it. And this is a much larger than any one individual and certainly much larger than the feelings of men who have predominantly been the ones who are terrified of all that has happened, and been very scared and frustrated and angry about it. And, and have not had a sense of how they can help or how they can stop it.

Amber Tamblyn:

And to them I'm always like, ‘Well, welcome to feeling out of control," because that is how women have always felt. And here's where we are and things are changing whether you like it or not.

Amber Tamblyn:

No one is asking you anymore. So, my advice is always just get on board, get on board because this is the way it's going. And in that moment, it was this incredible experience. And it was messy. It was painful, it was a lot of crying. It was a lot of sharing of stories and revelations about people you had worked with, men you had worked with women you had worked with who were awful, who had taken care of predators, who had silenced women who had blacklisted actresses.

Amber Tamblyn:

I mean it was all just coming out. It was coming out everywhere and it was really a very difficult time, but it was making us feel alive. And from that place is where Time's Up was born was this idea of we need to declare something. But that declaration needs to be matched with an action.

Amber Tamblyn:

It cannot just be, "Hey everyone, we're angry. Here's a letter." It had to be paired with something which is where the time's up. Legal defense fund came from.

Lauren Schiller:

This is all taking place. This is actually women physically present in a room together.

Amber Tamblyn:

Yeah. There were meetings happening all over LA and in New York too. Just everywhere. Anyone that had a sizable house that could fit 30 to 70 women at any given time and there was no... nobody knew what the hell they were doing, and people's feelings got hurt. It was not great for a lot of the times.

Amber Tamblyn:

White women were just dominating the rooms. Famous white women were trying to lead everything and make everything about them, and women of color were not having their voices heard in those rooms.

Amber Tamblyn:

And this was... this is all important to say though, because it helped us work on this conversation, which has needed to happen amongst women. This is the micro, micro, right? This is the meta, meta, that it's not only just about systems of power around us and men who are in... who are dominating those systems of power, but it is about the, what I call The Susan Collins Effect. So it is about the women who are adjacent and aligned with upholding that white privilege and that power, who are also themselves equally as responsible. And part of the problem.

Amber Tamblyn:

Well we can sort of put down our defenses and examine that, we're still going to be a part of that problem. And so, we had to have a lot of really tough conversations. They're still happening. This is a huge, huge community building exercise that has been led with a lot of passion and pain. And people want answers and they want justice. And sometimes those things don't come swiftly or swiftly enough. But I think we are seeing as I've said, at least things are changing. At least they are moving. And that to me is something

Lauren Schiller:

I'm Lauren Schiller and I'm talking with Amber Tamblyn, whose book Era of Ignition is out in paperback now subscribe to the Inflection Point Podcast and make a contribution toward our production at inflectionpointradio.org.

Lauren Schiller:

We're back with Amber Tamblyn, actress, director, women's rights advocate and co-founder of Time's Up. So what are you seeing that's changing that you're feeling good about?

Amber Tamblyn:

I think one of the most wonderful things I see is and again, I'll maybe I'll just speak for my industry because I think that's an important place to come from of what I know. There's a lot more engagement and conversation and public discourse and dialogue about women as directors, women running things, women being able to be the ones to green light, to decide the point of view, the narrative that's going to be told in a film or a TV show. My friend America Ferrera just executive produced a show called Gentrified which is coming out on Netflix.

Amber Tamblyn:

And you've got women like Janet Mock, trans women of color who just had an overall deal at Netflix, the first woman of color ever to have that there. And you're seeing sort of these unprecedented moves as far as whose voices are being able to be in the room, who is getting to be able to create content.

Amber Tamblyn:

You've got the Lena Waithe. You've got these incredibly powerful queer non-binary trans women, women of all kinds who are making huge strides in the business. And while it's still not enough, while you still look at for instance, I think the Annenberg Institute just came out with a huge... they come out with their annual Annenberg Institute study, which looks at gender inequality in the workplace and in our business and specific in the entertainment business.

Amber Tamblyn:

And you still look and there's still just low numbers. It's still something around like 4% for women directors and it's still really low. So there's still just a lot of work to be done. But I do see that changing in the business. I do see a greater need for women in writers' rooms, women behind the camera, women running the camera, women producing entertainment, all of those things. It's happening.

Lauren Schiller:

One of the many things that I loved about reading your book is that I felt like, I don't know if it was at the end of each chapter but definitely interspersed throughout each story, was what I the reader can take away from this and what I could go do to make a difference.

Lauren Schiller:

And some of the things that I pulled out from it are this idea of opening the door for others and offering access that others don't have. And the plus one-

Amber Tamblyn:

Isn't that great?

Lauren Schiller:

So could you elaborate on... I feel like those are all kind of mixed together, but you can parse them if you want. But could you elaborate on this?

Amber Tamblyn:

So plus one is something that came out of Time's Up which was an idea that we have in our business again, but it's been carried over into Time's Up healthcare and all kinds of different industries, where the idea is anybody at any level whether you're the most known powerful person or whether you feel you have nothing to offer does have something to offer.

Amber Tamblyn:

And sometimes that is often just access. For instance, I just talked about these Hollywood parties right? How much I hate going to them. Most people hate going to them. They really do. Except for this one Jeffrey Katzenberg party. But to think that I could squander the invitations that I get to an elite Hollywood party where you might be able to rub elbows with some of the most important showrunners, executives, people who are creating content is a privilege for me to have.

Amber Tamblyn:

And that is an access that I have always had. But I have never thought that that would be possibly interesting or important to anybody else. To a young budding writer, a young woman who came out of college you would love to be staffed on a show. The idea that I would squander that. And I think it took a long time for me to realize like that is one thing I have to offer.

Amber Tamblyn:

There are so many things I have to offer. For instance my novel that came out before this book called Any Man, a thing that I'd never considered before was book tours. I go on these huge 30 city book tours for a book. I get to read in front of these big amazing audiences. And I've never once considered taking, inviting someone to open for me or to read with me in that capacity.

Amber Tamblyn:

And so I did that on that book tour. And in every city, I put out a basically like an open call and said, "If you are a woman identifying, a woman of color. If you identify as a woman in any capacity. I want you to read with me. I want you to be able..." And I would give different women 10 minutes something like that to read with me during those shows in every single city.

Amber Tamblyn:

And it was awesome. It was great. I got to meet new writers, young women whose voices. My jaw was on the floor thinking, "You've never been published? I can't wait for the world to know your work". So it was also a gave to me as well getting to lift up people who would normally not have a platform like that.

Amber Tamblyn:

And I've asked that of other friends of mine who have done the same thing for me, who have been the Amy Poehler's of the world, the Roxanne Gays of the world women who are constantly giving, the America Ferreras of the world who constantly giving to other women around them, even if they're exhausted of doing one more favor, of one more help, of one more. Whatever that is are always there saying, "I get it because I always wanted someone to pull me forward and I'm going to pull you forward."

Amber Tamblyn:

And each of us has something to offer in that way. So, in the book I talk a lot about asking ourselves what we have to offer especially men. What do men have to offer? Even if it's something small, like we always will have something that we can offer. And we think that that doesn't mean anything but it actually does. Because one of the things we say with the plus one model is, you can't be what you can't see.

Amber Tamblyn:

And if you don't... if you have never been in the room where it happens, if you've never been in a pitch room pitching something or trying to get something sold, you don't know. And so the fear manifests itself into creating a closed off space for you where you don't want to go out and put yourself on a limb.

Amber Tamblyn:

And oftentimes if you are brought into that room, even just to be able to see how it goes, how a meeting goes, you might be surprised how much you could affect someone's life.

Amber Tamblyn:

So that's like one of the many things that I talk about in thereof of thinking about what each of us individually has, and not taking for granted the access that we have at any level. Yeah.

Lauren Schiller:

And that's I mean and it's another form in the business world of mentorship and advocacy and bringing others up along with you. something else that you address in the book is the concept of white feminism that white women, myself included. I will put myself in this very bucket have cringed at the notion of that there is even such a thing that we stand for all women.

Lauren Schiller:

And you actually break that notion up quite well. Can you speak to that and why you felt like it was something it was important to address?

Amber Tamblyn:

To me this is a very important thing to address because I think all of us need to own that term. And even though it is a negative of a pejorative term, it's something that we feel like we don't want to be. But the fact of the matter is we are. Every white woman I know at some form has used her privilege to not help somebody, to make things worse for someone, to protect themselves and their own feelings over those of someone who couldn't have that protection.

Amber Tamblyn:

So, I talk a lot about that examination. And again, for each of us if we are ever called in, that's a great by the way a great term that black feminist women use which is instead of calling somebody out, you call them in. I love that so much.

Amber Tamblyn:

And so if you are ever called in confronted about something that happened for us not to immediately become defensive, in the way that... in the same way that white women would really love for men not to be defensive when we speak our truth.

Amber Tamblyn:

And when we call in somebody and say this happened it was hurtful. Instead of becoming defensive to maybe take a moment, take a beat and think about what happened and absorb what the person is saying and asking of you.

Amber Tamblyn:

So, that chapter is really difficult because I talk about my own experiences in white feminism, and my own experiences as putting myself front and center in an activist world, and an organizing world and the privilege to be able to do that. And to consider though that maybe always our voices not necessarily the one that should be in the front and center of certain conversations, especially when we're talking about racism and things like that. And we should be amplifying and supporting women around us who have real experience with that.

Amber Tamblyn:

I think everything stems back in this book to the idea of letting ourselves be uncomfortable, of letting this chaotic moment in our culture in this time that we live in happen, let it happen. And it's okay to be afraid of it. It is okay to be terrified, to feel all the feelings you're going to feel of that discomfort, of that anger, of that frustration. But to never shy away from it and certainly to not to disengage from the conversation. That to me is the most dangerous thing.

Lauren Schiller:

Well, there was talk this year the Women's March recently happened. And there's always something bubbling up in the news about how badly it's managed or who's in charge and what's the point. And yet thousands and thousands of women still came out. Have you had any thoughts on the role of the March?

Amber Tamblyn:

I think that this is something that the world wants for women which is for us to tear each other apart and to fail. They want these movements to fail. We have to always remember that at the end of the day, the world we live in doesn't want this to succeed.

Amber Tamblyn:

It doesn't want the Women's March to succeed. It doesn't want Elizabeth Warren to succeed. It doesn't want any organization that is run predominantly by women. It doesn't want a fair fight to succeed. Stacey Abrams organization, you look at that and there are real palpable present ways in which our culture and the society around us tries to disband women and pull them apart and make them hate each other.

Amber Tamblyn:

That's what's happened in the entertainment industry for generations as well. This idea of you are always in competition with your sisters. It is not about who is the best for their work, who is going to get chosen that there is enough work for all of us. because that's never the case. There isn't. So it becomes this scarcity mentality of seeing other women as your severe competition in some way. And that can be said for organizing too.

Amber Tamblyn:

I think it's really important that the Women's March exists. I think it's really important what they did. Sarah Sophie Flicker, Paolo Mendoza, Melanie Stamp as well, Yadda Trabioso. They all went and did this last [Lastisus 00:41:42] dance in front of the White House. And there is nothing more powerful to me than angry women with these bandages over their eyes yelling these lyrics, and pointing at The White House and saying, "The rapist is you. The rapist was you. And it's not my fault. It's not where I was not how I dressed."

Amber Tamblyn:

And when you have this giant choir of women screaming that that's really cathartic, but it's also very moving and important and being able to March, being able to show dissent and to be able to show up and resist against these forms of government and this form of oppression and language is a Rite of passage for especially for Americans.

Amber Tamblyn:

And so to me it's important that the Women's March still exists in that capacity. I don't know what's going on for their future. I don't know much about the inside politics of that but I do believe it's important for women to continue to show up. Even when it's most difficult, even when we are ripping at each other's throats and angry and frustrated and feeling erased. I think we have to keep showing up for each other.

Lauren Schiller:

Well, so here we are. We had six female candidates running for the current election. We're down to two as of this recording.

Amber Tamblyn:

And the New York Times couldn't pick one. So they think both.

Lauren Schiller:

I'm kind of I'm like always the silver lining person. My take on that was yeah, that was kind of weird. But also, hey two for one. I mean they both got Amy Klobuchar, Elizabeth Warren both got some words behind them and in for the record.

Amber Tamblyn:

I mean I record I think it's fine. I think it's fine but I still just question that idea of one is not enough. One is not enough. One can't be trustworthy enough. One can't be perfect enough to do this work. So, I think that's a little frustrating, but it's also... we're just we're in a different world and whether or not Elizabeth Warren wins the nomination, that's my hope anyway. I'm a big supporter of hers.

Amber Tamblyn:

But if it doesn't happen, we are going to continue to have these conversations about sexism, about this idea of perversing women's narratives and leaning into age old deeply sexist propaganda.

Lauren Schiller:

Your book opens with you talking with your newlywed husband, newly wedded husband about the fact that you are pregnant and that you want to terminate the pregnancy. And as we sit here, the president of our country is speaking at the anti-choice rally that happens every year like a week after the Women's March. And you conclude your book talking about choice and Women's Choice and choices of women.

Amber Tamblyn:

I think we have to just forever push against the idea that that choice belongs to anyone other than the body in which that choice is being inhabited. Abortion is normal. Animals do it. Humans do it. We are a species that has a conscious mind. We have the ability to understand things in a way that other animals do not. And abortion is normal. Abortion is normal, abortion is normal, Abortion is normal, Abortion is normal.

Lauren Schiller:

More broadly speaking around this idea of women's choice, I mean what is your... what would you say your vision is for women? Where would you like the imagined future in your lifetime?

Amber Tamblyn:

So, I think the best way to answer that question is to sort of paraphrase Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, which when she was asked how will she know when there's enough women on the Supreme Court, she said, "When there are nine."

Amber Tamblyn:

And I think that that's just something for people to think about. And I think everyone will come away with a different feeling about that answer. Some people will think that means Ruth Bader Ginsburg wants men to be erased. Some women will understand that, that means we just want a seat at the table, a full seat at the table for a little while until things are balanced out.

Amber Tamblyn:

We want to know what that feels like to not be questioned. For that not to be a strange thing that only one voice, only one color of skin has been the only voice that has literally created this country. And so, I want people to think about that.

Lauren Schiller:

I love that. What's the best call to action that someone else has shared with you that you'd like to share?

Amber Tamblyn:

The best call to action. Oh, there's so many different things but I think that came from America Ferrera, who to me is just such an extraordinary human being and created this organization called Harness, and really has worked in these organizational spheres for a long time now and is a really brilliant mind. She's a great actress and a great producer and all those things, but she's a brilliant mind.

Amber Tamblyn:

I cannot wait to work for her presidential campaign someday. I'll do whatever. I'll wash your laundry. Just tell me what you want. I'll rub your feet. It doesn't matter. I'll do it. But I think there was in the frustration, a lot of the frustration that came out at the end of 2017 during that time when Time's Up was being formed and all of that and there was many women were feeling very much like they weren't being seen or weren't being appreciated for the work they were doing.

Amber Tamblyn:

I myself had some feelings around that. And I remember that America said, "If you are waiting for other women to give you a pat on the back and give you a reward for trying to change the world, you're going to be waiting a very long time," which is a simple thing to say but this idea of don't wait to be congratulated. You don't need to do that. You don't need permission to be angry about something and to go out and find out a way to do it.

Amber Tamblyn:

That tells me, go find three or four girlfriends that are your friends that you might have something in common that you feel like needs to change whether it's in your workplace, whether it's within your social community like whatever that is and start talking about it, and start talking about what each of you has to offer and to remember to not let your ego get in the way of that work, of needing to be front and center of everything.

Amber Tamblyn:

Sometimes deferment is the most powerful thing we can give, is to be able to step back and learn from someone else. I would say this again, it's always usually predominantly like America women of color. You can learn a lot from women of color, which just means step back and listen. Do more listening than you do the talking. But to remember that to not let your ego get in the way of it.

Lauren Schiller:

That was Amber Tamblyn, actor, director, poet and advocate for women's rights. Her latest book is Era of Ignition. I'll put a link to it and Ambers original op-ed on my website at inflectionpointradio.org. I'm Lauren Schiller. This is Inflection Point, and this is how women rise up.

Lauren Schiller:

That's our inflection point for today. All of our episodes are on Apple podcasts, Radio Public, Stitcher, Pandora, NPR One, all the places. Give us a five star review and subscribe to the podcast. Know women leading change we should talk to. Let us know at inflectionpointradio.org.

Lauren Schiller:

While you're there, support our production with a tax deductible monthly or one time contribution. When women rise up, we all rise up. Just go to inflectionpointradio.org. We're on Facebook and Instagram at inflectionpointradio. Follow us and join the Inflection Point society. Our Facebook group of everyday activists who seek to make extraordinary change through small daily actions. And follow me on Twitter LASchiller.

Lauren Schiller:

To find out more about today's guest and to be in the loop with our email newsletter, you know where to go, inflectionpointradio.org.

Lauren Schiller:

Inflection Point is produced in partnership with KALW 91.7 FM in San Francisco and PRX. Our community manager is Laura Weaver. Our engineer and producer is Eric Wayne. I'm your host Lauren Schiller.

Speaker 3:

Support for this podcast comes from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

Speaker 4:

From PRX.

 

Amber_Lauren

“Put down your male fragility”: Scene On Radio’s John Biewen & Celeste Headlee on how men can help fight patriarchy

What’s going on with men? Why is it so hard to negotiate the gender power dynamic in everyday situations, like work meetings? Can masculinity exist without its more toxic forms? And why can men get away with sexual misconduct---and even end up seeming like the “real” victim when they’re accused?

While I’ve taken this season of Inflection Point to focus on what women can do to rise up and have more power, John Biewen and Celeste Headlee of Scene on Radio - MEN have been examining how the patriarchy that we’re rising up against was formed in the first place--and what to do about it.

Today we’re taking a look at the conversations we’ve had over the past seasons of both shows and comparing notes to see if we can find some answers---together.

Celeste and John option 2.jpg

A Boardroom of Our Own: Julia Rhodes Davis on All-Women Spaces and The Future of AI

Ask any woman who’s sat through a long meeting surrounded by men, and she could tell you how exhausting it can be: we struggle to make ourselves heard while carefully avoiding accusations of being ‘bitchy,’ ‘strident,’ or ‘shrill.’ We rarely have the kind of permission to fail that our male counterparts get. We want to take ownership of what little power is tossed our way, yet we’re always at risk of being punished for wielding such power.  


Which is why Julia Rhodes Davis decided to form an all-women board for the non-profit, Vote.org. The question is, can the empowerment that takes place in an all-women board meeting translate into actual, world-changing power once they step outside the boardroom?

Find out what Julia has to say about turning empowerment into power, and also shaping the future so women and minorities don’t need to be “empowered” anymore.

Listen to my conversation with Julia Rhodes, Chair of Vote.org and Director of Partnerships at The Partnership on AI in the latest episode of Inflection Point.

Screen+Shot+2018-09-12+at+8.43.36+AM.jpg

TRANSCRIPT

Lauren Schiller:                  Women are banding together in ways we haven't seen since the feminist revolution of the 1970s. The Women's March, the #MeToo movement. More women than ever are running for office and actually winning elections. There are girls-only engineering camps, girls-only maker camps, girls-only afterschool clubs, and they're growing like crazy. So it would seem to be an incredibly empowering time for women. But there's the trendiness factor. The word "feminist" on every other t-shirt in yoga class, "Like a girl" and "nasty woman" have become marketable catchphrases on Nike ads and sanitary pads and coffee mugs. I mean, I love it, but is that mug really going to get you promoted? Because there's one question that has been bothering me: "Does all this empowerment equal power?"

Lauren Schiller:                  I thought one good place to start to understand this would be to look at the boardroom. That's a consolidation of power if ever there were one. As the chair of the board of Vote.org, Julia Rhodes Davis was empowered to decide who to include on that board. With her CEO, also a woman, they made a conscious decision to only appoint women. I wanted to know why and what it was actually doing for them.

Lauren Schiller:                  But first, let's take a closer look at this trend of all-girl and all-women spaces.

Julia R Davis:                        I think that all-women spaces could be seen as sort of incubators. In other words, incubators or startups or whatever are these places that foster early-stage ideas and provide extra resourcing around the things that are most vulnerable at startups like infrastructure and funding and access to networks and access to know-how. I think that when you think about all-women spaces in a similar way, it's not that we're going to stay in all-women spaces, to your point, but I think especially for younger women and girls there's so much risk taking and failure that comes with learning, especially in sort of the early pursuit of anything. When the world is conditioning young women to be afraid of failure because our worth is attached to our achievement and, by the way, also our appearance and so forth and so on, it's really existentially unsafe for us to fail. I think that that's a huge loss.

Julia R Davis:                        There's actually an amazing ... the founder of Girls Who Code, Reshma Saujani gives a beautiful TED Talk to this idea that we need to create spaces that are safe for girls to fail, because that's actually how you become an entrepreneur and how you become successful.

Lauren Schiller:                  She's actually been a guest on this show.

Julia R Davis:                        Oh, amazing. Well done.

Lauren Schiller:                  Yeah, and we do talk about that. So it sounds like you're in the camp of, "Women-only spaces can be a place where we can learn to navigate the "real-word" having gathered our strength and gone out there to make things happen." But do you think it actually is a way of solving gender inequality?

Julia R Davis:                        I think it depends on your timeframe. Here I would really sort of look at how power operates. Right? Let's take a few examples. There are right now, or actually I guess this stat is from 2016 from Time Magazine. 77% of all elected officials in the US are mail, 23% are female. So until we're starting to approach parity in terms of a representative government, I am all for as many organizations as possible working on the issue of bringing more women into public office. I think, similarly, if we look at who's writing political checks right now, 80% of political donors, 80% of all dollars political donations are written by men. That means that essentially ... I mean, that just points to how power is going to operate. So I would push for getting as many women to become political donors as possible to shift that power dynamic.

Julia R Davis:                        Then, you look at nonprofit boards. 80% of nonprofit board members are men. So until we shift that dynamic I am all for going in the opposite direction and really taking an exceptional tact to get exceptional results.

Lauren Schiller:                  What would you see in this polarized time as the role of women-only spaces?

Julia R Davis:                        I'm not sure that the role has actually changed very much from the inception of at least women-created women-only spaces. What I mean by that is-

Lauren Schiller:                  That's such an important distinction, by the way, "women-created women-only spaces".

Julia R Davis:                        Yeah. I mean, the paternalism of men creating women-only spaces is a whole different topic. Right?

Lauren Schiller:                  I hadn't actually thought about it in different terms than "women-created". Yeah, that's so interesting.

Julia R Davis:                        Well, because I actually don't know the founding history of, for example ... my first attempt at college was Mount Holyoke College, which was an all-women's school. It is a very small liberal arts school in western Massachusetts. I had grown up in New York City and I showed up and there were more rules and oversight at college than I had in my parents' home in New York City.

Julia R Davis:                        My parents were neither really conservative in terms of minding my time, nor were they extremely permissive. They were somewhere in the middle. When I really unpacked the Mount Holyoke experience and ultimately why it was not a good fit for me, there was a paternalism that was claimed by the administration of the school, as though we as a school of young women couldn't, individually young women, couldn't possibly make decisions for ourselves that would keep us safe and happy and well, which I just reject outright.

Julia R Davis:                        Anyway, that's just a little bit of a tangent on that.

Lauren Schiller:                  Well, no, but you obviously didn't know that before you started classes. What was your expectation and hopes for why you would go to an all-women's college?

Julia R Davis:                        Yeah, thanks. I think people tout that there's a freedom in an all-female classroom, for example, for women to find their voice and, to be honest, in a lot of ways I didn't have much trouble finding my voice. I probably often have too loud a voice. Although, put me in a room where I feel intimidated and all of a sudden that changes a lot, or certainly when I was younger it changed a lot. So I think I went for the promise of kind of the freedom of finding my voice and not having to fight for a voice in the classroom or fight for attention of advisors to pursue special projects or whatever the case may be. Because I do think that oftentimes women and men compete differently. I think when you put a group of women together, even if it's a competitive environment, if the rules of the game are not prescribed by sort of a masculine framework of power, you often find collaboration.

Julia R Davis:                        You'll get a winner at the end, some woman will rise to the top, but there's probably a lot more collaboration to get to the top than if you're in a situation where the only way is to compete and dominate those around. And, you know, obviously that's an over generalization. But I think that's one of the things at play.

Lauren Schiller:                  So your hope was that by going to an all-women college that you would eliminate all of those variables?

Julia R Davis:                        Yeah, totally. Because, I will say I went to an all-girl summer camp for 10 years, first as a camper and then as a staff member. It was so liberating. I mean, it was an extraordinary experience of finding myself and figuring out how to be in the world in a way that I could feel good about. Yeah, there were no men there, no boys there. It was a really free experience.

Lauren Schiller:                  Mount Holyoke, where Julia Rhodes Davis went to school briefly, was the first of the Seven Sisters All-Women's Colleges, which have collectively produced some of the most influential women of our time. Here's seven of them: Emily Dickinson, Grace Hopper, Jane Fonda, Hillary Clinton, Gloria Steinem, Helen Keller, and Zora Neale Hurston. I myself went to Vassar, but as one school t-shirt proclaims, 1969 was the year Vassar switched position, meaning they let guys in by the time I went there.

Lauren Schiller:                  But before that, in 1837, starting with Mount Holyoke, women's colleges were created because women weren't allowed to learn or be leaders in the same spaces as men. Since the founding of the Seven Sisters, families whose names were on buildings and museums sent their daughters to these schools, not necessarily to empower them, but to wrap them in the safety of high society. The plan was for white women who had means to go to school, meet well-connected friends and find a suitable husband from Harvard or Yale, you know, that MRS degree.

Lauren Schiller:                  It took 181 years to get from Mount Holyoke to the first female presidential candidate to be nominated by a major party. And, well, you know how that turned out. Julia Rhodes Davis, as chair of the board at Vote.org, is working to ensure that everyone is being represented at the ballot box and in the boardroom.

Lauren Schiller:                  Tell me about Vote.org. What do they do? Then let's talk about their board.

Julia R Davis:                        Vote.org is a nonprofit, nonpartisan 501(c)(3) organization that seeks to bring about reflective democracy wherein the electorate matches the population. We do that through making it easier to vote, period. We have programs that are focused on leveraging technology as much as possible to do really high-impact Get Out the Vote campaigns and have a number of other programs that are sort of longer-lead focused.

Julia R Davis:                        One of the reasons we don't have electronic or online voter registration in most states in this country has a lot to do with sort of antiquated voter registration laws that, unlike a lot of other voter suppression activities, these are not actually insidiously antiquated, they just are literally antiquated. So over the course of the next several years we're focused on working with secretaries of state to shift those laws. But in the interim it's really about focusing on who's not getting to the polls and why, and taking a double-down effort to get them there.

Lauren Schiller:                  So as far as your role at Vote.org, you're the chair of the board and you had an opportunity recently to reshape what that board looks like and who was on it. Tell me what you did and why in terms of the makeup of that board.

Julia R Davis:                        I think at Vote.org the commitment is really to exceptional results. So we kind of look across the board at, "Well, what's the status quo or what are the norms in this space and how can we think and do differently?" So when it came to board composition, when you look at the fact that 80% of nonprofit board members are male, well, let's be exceptional there and create an all-female board.

Julia R Davis:                        Will this be in perpetuity? I don't know. But for right now it's working really, really well. We convene the new board in January of this year and it's a small board that are all female. We spent 10 hours in a room together doing all kinds of planning and thinking and debating and so forth, and then we had a dinner that followed on. At the end of it I reflected with a colleague, a fellow board member, "You know, normally at the end of any board meeting, whether I'm on the board or on the staff serving the board, I'm exhausted. This time I'm energized. What's the difference?" It took me a beat to realize that not having to facilitate and manage around gender politics in a boardroom was a very liberating experience.

Julia R Davis:                        So back to the idea of the incubator, the all-women spaces and incubator. Just having that experience and that awareness gave me tools to start looking at other boardrooms that I participate in, for example, and helping to bring some leadership to, "Let's imagine if this looked different." Because I actually don't think that mixed-gender boardrooms are the wrong way to go necessarily. I do think that in general people need more self-awareness about how they show up in a room. So whether you're a man who doesn't necessarily have self-awareness about talking over others or taking credit for other people's ideas, or you're a woman who perhaps doesn't listen very well. I think being in a space where we didn't have to spend a lot of energy making sure that all the voices were heard and so forth and so on, because there was just a more natural flow. It gave me a sense of what's possible. So experiencing the art of the possible in one space can actually help to bring examples of making that a possibility in other spaces.

Lauren Schiller:                  I mean, I'm trying to imagine if the chair of a board of, just pick any other organization, was like, "You know what? We're going to make this board all men." Which is happening, obviously. It's 80%.

Julia R Davis:                        I mean, it has been the norm forever.

Lauren Schiller:                  Right. Exactly. I mean, have you received any backlash for making this decision [crosstalk 00:16:56]?

Julia R Davis:                        I'm sure I will now that I've been on a podcast talking about it. We have not received to date any backlash, and the men that were on our board prior to this cycle were extremely supportive of the idea, so I will say that.

Julia R Davis:                        I think that we have to look at these things in a more global context. This sort of comes back to how I was talking about kind of the power analysis. So if men were marginalized, men would need all-men spaces, but they're not marginalized. Every system of power in place right now is still designed with the benefit of men. So until that's different, this is not a one-to-one comparison. Women need to build power to create a more equal society. Until that's not a need, I think all-women spaces are completely justified as one way towards that end.

Lauren Schiller:                  So thinking about the Vote.org all-female board as this sort of incubator idea, a testing ground and a place for new ideas to proliferate, both inside the board and out into the world, have you set sort of a success metric in terms of, is it working, when do you reevaluate, what happens next?

Julia R Davis:                        So there's a sort of goal-setting framework that's pretty common in tech or tech-inspired organizations, the OKR: Objectives and Key Results framework. So we're developing actual metrics for board performance. I think that that is the place where we'll look to first to see if we're making progress.

Julia R Davis:                        If you're asking is there a point at which we're going to say this all-female board thing was a success or a failure, I mean, I suppose that's an important question for us to be asking, but I think it's pretty early days for us to be framing it up that way.

Lauren Schiller:                  Yeah, or whether you want to ... if you have a seat open up, whether you're going to continue to look specifically for women, or-

Julia R Davis:                        Oh, we will. I would say for the foreseeable future, but definitely through 2020. I think it's too short a timeframe to expect to see any significant results being a two-year-old organization.

Lauren Schiller:                  Julia's feeling optimistic about her all-female board and I can see why. More women-only spaces are popping up so fast it's hard to keep tracking: women's coworking spaces, event spaces, gyms, networking organizations. In New York The Wing and [Cubby 00:19:44] Club, in San Francisco The Ruby and The Assembly. And while some are quietly growing their member base, others are getting admonished. The Wing for not being in compliance with New York's public accommodation law; a law ironically created to further gender equality. And remember when the Alamo Drafthouse in Austin announced it would host two Wonder Woman screenings where no men were allowed at its downtown location? They were accused of violating city equality laws. But as Glynnis MacNicol, cofounder of The List, a network and visibility platform for professional women from all industries, told the male host of the Story in a Bottle podcast, "As a man that has access to every place, why is it a problem to allow women a safe space?"

Lauren Schiller:                  I brought Julia in to talk with me about the Vote.org all-female board and women-only spaces in general. But she also recently took a job at the Partnership on AI for the Benefit of the People and Society. That's the full name of the organization.

Lauren Schiller:                  We've all heard that insidious things like bias and tribalism can be perpetuated by artificial intelligence, but if you've got someone like Julia empowered who applies an equity lens to everything she does, could that actually shift the power dynamic?

Lauren Schiller:                  But first, don't forget to hit that subscribe button. I'm Lauren Schiller. This is Inflection Point. We'll be right back.

Lauren Schiller:                  It's time for a shout-out to Care/of for supporting this show. What is Care/of, you might ask? It's a monthly subscription vitamin service that delivers completely personalized vitamin and supplement packs, right to your door. The vitamin aisle is overwhelming, but there's an easier way to figure out what's right for you. I took Care/of's online quiz, which asks you about your diet, health goals and lifestyle choices to find out what vitamins and supplements you specifically need. It only takes five minutes. For me, I wanted to get more sleep, give my nails a chance to get stronger, and have more energy. They account for all of that. Then, your vitamins get delivered right to your door in personalized, easy-to-remember, daily packs, perfect for a busy on-the-go lifestyle. And, your monthly subscription box can be easily modified at any time.

Lauren Schiller:                  When they arrive, it's so great. The Care/of packs have your name on them, and a little bit of inspiration to start your day. For 25% off your first month of personalized Care/of vitamins, visit TakeCareOf.com and enter "Inflection". That's TakeCareOf.com and enter "Inflection", for 25% off your first month of personalized Care/of vitamins.

Lauren Schiller:                  I'm Lauren Schiller and this is inflection point. I'm talking with Julia Rhodes Davis, the chair of the board of Vote.org and director of partnerships at the Partnership on AI.

Lauren Schiller:                  So, Julia, what is the Partnership on AI?

Julia R Davis:                        The organization is really ... it's a multi-stakeholder membership organization, which really means that it has representatives from corporations and from civil society, from academic research institutions and others, all of whom are working together to really shape the future of artificial intelligence. From my perspective, this is really the frontier of society. There's so much we don't know, and I think early indications of the impact that technology can have on society suggests that we're in for a ride and we really do need to play a more proactive role in informing and designing technology so that it does benefit people and does as little harm as possible, I guess is the way I can say that.

Lauren Schiller:                  So when you said there's already been some indications that there could potentially be harm, are you thinking of a specific example?

Julia R Davis:                        I mean, you could really point to our current democracy in the United States as an example of at least technology broadly that is in some ways supported by aspects of AI technology. I mean, Facebook was used as a platform and by a foreign power to influence our Democratic election in 2016. That is a pretty significant thing that's happened.

Julia R Davis:                        I think that there are a lot of questions in general right now about, you know, for an organization or company who has previously thought of itself as this neutral utility of being a platform to connect people when it can be used for such insidious ends, what is the responsibility of that company to mitigate that risk? I think that's an extremely important question that should be extrapolated to the entire technology industry and to those of us in and around it. What are our responsibilities to society at large?

Lauren Schiller:                  Can you define artificial intelligence? I mean, is it always some sort of human manifestation or human impersonation? What is it?

Julia R Davis:                        That's a great question and you'll get a million different answers to it depending on who you ask. I think first of all it's worth noting I don't have a technical background. I came into this sort of intersection of technology and society in my career about five years ago and have increased my knowledge hundredsfold as a result of working closely with technologists. So I have a different answer than someone who, say, got a PhD in computer science. But in general, this is a very broad term that I think now media has even further muddied the waters generally, because a lot of folks don't understand the technology, so they're trying to put words to it that don't necessarily get us very far in terms of understanding.

Julia R Davis:                        I think it's an umbrella term that really speaks to sort of making machines more intelligent. What I mean by that is, I think in its very basic sense, a computer that can run a program that has some similarities to a decision-making process could be considered artificial intelligence. So, in fact, your entire smartphone runs on all kinds of "artificial intelligence". Really what that means is there are a number of decision trees that are programmed into the different applications on your phone. The thing that supercharges this technology is that much of these formulas or algorithms as they're known in technical parlance actually adapt over time.

Julia R Davis:                        I think one thing for everyone to understand about AI is this is not a fixed too. So unlike a hammer and a nail, they are a hammer and a nail and you really can't change their form very easily. When you're a user of a smartphone or a user of any kind of AI technology at all, your use of that technology actually changes how that technology operates. So we have this iterative relationship with technology that I think few users understand. I think we should all feel more empowered by that, actually.

Julia R Davis:                        When you choose to use Facebook in a particular way to click on an ad or not, you're actually informing Facebook in the future of how it should relate to you. That can sound scary, but I also think it can sound really empowering and I think that the latter is a better relationship that we should start to cultivate with our technology if we're going to have a better future around it.

Lauren Schiller:                  The thing that I'm trying to understand about the role of AI in the human world and how humans are already interacting with each other is how whoever is sort of setting this technology loose influences the way that it interacts with the world and how that might either magnify or reduce the bias that is already in the world, be it racial, gender, pick one.

Julia R Davis:                        Yeah. So this is a huge topic and a really important one.

Lauren Schiller:                  We're going to solve it today, Julia.

Julia R Davis:                        Yes, please. There are a lot of efforts in the technical community to mitigate and solve for the ways in which data carries bias and can further bias algorithms and therefore technology systems. There are unbelievable examples of early apps that were ... I think there was a health app that was put out early on that had been built entirely by a male engineering team and had zero acknowledgement of menstruation as a regular part of the health that women experience on a monthly, daily basis. So those oversights are sort of the most obvious examples of the ways in which who builds the technology and how they think and who's around the table really informs society.

Julia R Davis:                        I think that we have to think about it in a number of different ways. I actually am really excited about my work at Partnership on AI, because there is a deep recognition on the part of the organization that we have to have a diverse set of voices and stakeholders around the table when we are making decisions about what this technology is going to do and how it's built and designed and so forth.

Julia R Davis:                        I think that there's a long way to go in terms of being able to sort of have more practical ways that engineers in a room can kind of have a checklist that helps them recognize where their own biases might be and how to mitigate them in a technical capacity.

Julia R Davis:                        Then, there's a whole body of work around the pipeline issue and the fact that you have far fewer women in STEM, and though that's changing over time, I think it's a slow process. You have a far fewer number of people of color in STEM as well for all kinds of reasons. So there are many, many efforts to address these different ways in which bias can show up in technology. I think it's important for technology creators to bridge the gap, to sort of shift the systemic issues that contribute to the fact that most technologists are male, for example. That's going to take time. So what do we do in the interim and what are the incentives that we have at our fingertips to kind of shift that landscape?

Lauren Schiller:                  Man. It seems like with every new innovation it's an opportunity to get ahead, but it's also just this opportunity to just make it worse.

Julia R Davis:                        Yeah. I heard a really compelling conversation between Reid Hoffman, founder of LinkedIn, partner at Greylock, et cetera, I think most people know who he is, and Kara Swisher, who's a really fantastic media editor, I guess, and host of the Recode podcast. They were in a public conversation at a conference in San Francisco and they ... Kara was really pressing Reid on, "Why is it that tech companies so often fail to identify unintended consequences and address them before they become the problematic unintended consequences of, say, an intervened election or something like that?"

Julia R Davis:                        Reid's response, it's on the record, is, "When you have a homogenous group of young, largely white, regularly affluently-raised men around a table building a product, this is a group of people who haven't lost very much in their lives, so they're not all that familiar with what it looks like to be on the losing end of an unintended consequence." I mean, that has just sat with me at the front of my mind ever since I heard that conversation. I mean, it certainly speaks to something I've believed for a long time, but to hear it from Reid Hoffman sort of put some teeth to it in a way.

Julia R Davis:                        I think that that should be reason enough to really push for more diverse rooms, whether it's the engineering room as it were, or the boardroom.

Lauren Schiller:                  We need AI to recognize all different kinds of people right now, but we don't have people working on AI that recognize all kinds of different people right now. So how do we get where we need to be, given where we are in this moment? How does your equity lens that you put on everything you see tie into the work that you're doing with Partnership on AI?

Julia R Davis:                        I think that there's two angles to an answer, or there are two different kinds of answers here, one of which I can speak to more directly and one of which is worth mentioning that it's worthy work that other people are doing.

Julia R Davis:                        Representation among engineers matters tremendously if we are going to solve for a more, both inclusively designed and inclusively executed, if you will, technology. The issues of getting more women into technology spaces is huge and I think that there are a number of incredible organizations focused on that and we need to proliferate those efforts across the board. This has to be a serious focus of every technology company, of every academic institution, of ever undergraduate program, et cetera. So that's a huge undertaking that I fully support and I'm so grateful for people who dedicate their work to that.

Julia R Davis:                        At Partnership on AI, I am looking at this question right now in terms of who is our current membership. We have just over 70 members currently and they represent corporations, they represent think tanks, they represent academic labs, research labs, also human rights organizations, advocacy organizations. There's more representation from some parts of sectors and less from others. There are certain constituents who are more and less represented. So I'm very actively trying to understand whose voice is at the table and whose voice is missing and how do we balance who's around the table. That's really at the forefront of my mind in day eight of my job as the director of partnerships.

Julia R Davis:                        We have an institutional commitment, both in terms of our executive director, Terah Lyons, who comes out of the Obama White House, as well as our board to really make sure that our multi-stakeholder organization is representative of and represented by a diverse set of stakeholders, and more to come on that. I think we're doing a good job and I think there's more improvements that we can make in terms of, you know, to get back to sort of the impetus for the question, "How do we make sure that AI is built for and by everyone?"

Lauren Schiller:                  Most of us move through the world with blind spots. Those blind spots are typically created where we grew up and by the stories we were told. Julie Rhodes Davis seems to be called to make places of power blind-spot-free so everyone's story is represented. Where did her obsession with representation come from?

Julia R Davis:                        I come from a long line of change-makers, especially on my mother's side of the family. My mother's family is from North Carolina. Back in the turn of the 20th Century, my great grandfather was one of the leaders around opening the first school for black children in Pender County, North Carolina. And as a result, my grandmother, his daughter, grew up with the Ku Klux Klan regularly visiting the house to intimidate the family, my family, and to try to get them to close the school down.

Julia R Davis:                        Family story goes, you know, hard to fact check this one, but my great-grandfather would regularly go out and meet the Klan and just stand there with actually a shotgun in his hand and just acknowledge them but not kowtow. The line was, "I'll see you in church on Sunday."

Julia R Davis:                        That translated to my grandmother and grandfather participating a lot in Civil Rights marches in Louisville, Kentucky where they raised their family and where my mother grew up. My mother has gone on to build a really impressive institution that trains progressive religious leaders to help bring about a more just and equitable society.

Lauren Schiller:                  What's it called?

Julia R Davis:                        Auburn Seminary. So with that background, you wonder where does technology fit in.

Lauren Schiller:                  Well, even before we get to where does technology fit in ... I mean, as far as you growing up, and that's obviously ... it's sort of baked into your growing up experience and the stories of your family and stuff like that, but have you personally experienced your own ... I mean, you're a white woman, but have you experienced your own inequity or anything you'd care to share that might also have influenced your trajectory? Like the first time you were like, "Hey, that's not fair."

Julia R Davis:                        I wish I could remember the first time. I mean, I think the most ... I mean, first of all, I remember seeing a movie, I think I was probably seven or eight years old, I can't really remember. It was called Class Action. I said to my parents, "I want to be a litigator," once I saw that movie. So I think very early on I kind of understood that there was a way in which standing up for what's right and being a precocious young person and girl was somehow subversive.

Julia R Davis:                        I was really politicized really early. I mean, I remember Clinton and Bush running against each other and really feeling very strongly that Bill Clinton should win the election, and I was relatively young. So certainly I was aware of politics, I felt sort of engaged by politics, I was writing current even articles in the seventh grade about politics. I think abortion actually ... abortion access was the first issue that really hit home for me, just in that I remember hearing male relatives speaking about abortion access as though they had any right to any opinion whatsoever. I remember being at a family function and I was probably 16 or 17 years old, talking to 10 fully grown male uncles and grandfather, all of whom were anti-choice, and basically just holding the line and arguing sort of every angle of the point, but ultimately, not willing to see ground around reproductive rights.

Lauren Schiller:                  How did you handle that?

Julia R Davis:                        You know, righteous anger is a good thing, Lauren. I mean, I think on some level I do feel in my bones what is right. Bodily autonomy is something that we all need. It is a human right. The fact that there are women in this country and around this globe who literally every day do not have full control over their bodies is unreal. It's a horrifying thing.

Lauren Schiller:                  Since you brought up abortion and pro-choice/anti-choice, are your parents ... are you guys in the same camp?

Julia R Davis:                        Oh hell yeah.

Lauren Schiller:                  Okay. It's just the uncles. It's always the uncles.

Julia R Davis:                        Exactly. Again this is why I sort of put it in the frame of bodily autonomy. The my mind, the political issue is about controlling women. It has nothing to do, really, with the individual case or what is claimed.

Lauren Schiller:                  I probably should know what this means, but what does it mean to pray with your feet?

Julia R Davis:                        Oh, it's shorthand, I think, for the behaviors we engage in. How we show up in the world I think is the evidence for our beliefs. So if you believe in justice and equality for all, what are you doing to, in the real world, to bring those beliefs about? Quite frankly, if you are pro-life, what are you doing to live that value?

Julia R Davis:                        I mean, this is where I think language really matters. The religious right, the conservative right that sort of started in the Reagan era and built power through Jerry Falwell's church and so forth, they did a masterful job of claiming language. But if you don't stand up for people on death row who have not gotten a fair trial and who are there because of racism and because of xenophobia, that is not pro-life to me. If you put the life of a woman behind a nonentity, that's not pro-life to me either. Quite frankly, if you put your ... let's go down the list, and there are much more articulate people than I on this subject, but the effects of climate change ... is killing our planet and really changing the course of the lives of our collective children. The right has done nothing to preserve life in that regard.

Lauren Schiller:                  I'd love to know what the best advice that you've ever been given is about how to find and be your authentic self.

Julia R Davis:                        You know what's interesting? I've gotten unbelievable amounts of wonderful, wise advice over the years. I've had an incredible access to women of all ages who've played tremendous roles in terms of mentorship and advice-giving and wisdom, both in sort of more formal settings and also just friends around the dinner table.

Julia R Davis:                        At the end of the day, the thing I've learned, it's not someone else's advice, the thing I've learned is any amount of advice is only as good as how much work you're willing to do yourself; how much work I've been willing to do myself. I think everybody's sort of demons are different in a way, but I guess my take on that is you have to find ways to internalize your wins and really fundamentally believe that you are enough just the way you are.

Lauren Schiller:                  Julia Rhodes Davis created her own all-woman space in the boardroom for Vote.org and is willing to give it some time to see if it not only feels good, it does good. As the director of partnerships for the Partnership on AI, Julie is making sure diverse voices are at the table when it comes to who and what technology is used for.

Lauren Schiller:                  I want to hear your stories of how empowerment has led to power. Tell us about a moment when you were empowered by going to our Facebook group, The Inflection Point Society, or go to InflectionPointSociety.org. I'm Lauren Schiller and this is Inflection Point.

Lauren Schiller:                  That's our Inflection Point for today. All of our episodes are on Apple Podcasts, RadioPublic, Stitcher and NPR One. Give us a five-star review and subscribe to the podcast. Know a woman with a great rising-up story? Let us know at InflectionPointRadio.org. While you're there, I invite you to support Inflection Point with a monthly or a one-time contribution. Your support keeps women's stories front and center. Just go to InflectionPointRadio.org.

Lauren Schiller:                  We're on Facebook at Inflection Point Radio. Follow us and follow me on Twitter @laschiller. To find out more about the guests you heard today and to sign up for our email newsletter, you know where to go: InflectionPointRadio.org.

Lauren Schiller:                  Inflection Point is produced in partnership with KALW 91.7 FM in San Francisco and PRX. Our story editor and content manager is Alaura Weaver. Our engineer and producer is Eric Wayne. I'm your host, Lauren Schiller.

Speaker 3:                              Support for this podcast comes from the Corporation For Public Broadcasting.

Speaker 4:                              From PRX.