Eve Rodsky is Ending Gendered Division of Labor at Home

LISTEN ON: APPLE PODCASTS | STITCHER | PANDORA | SPOTIFY | NPR ONE | MORE

When Eve Rodsky found herself sobbing on the side of the road over a text about blueberries, she knew something had to change. Hence began her seven year quest to create a more equitable division of labor at home. Her book is called "Fair Play. A Game-Changing Solution for When You Have Too Much to Do (and More Life to Live)" and her solutions are based on extensive research with experts from sociologists to neuroscientists to behavioral economists and conversations with couples all over the country.

TRANSCRIPT: We do our best, please forgive or let us know any errors.

Eve Rodsky:                           I find myself sobbing on the side of the road over a text my husband, Seth, sent me and it just said, "I'm surprised you didn't get blueberries." And you can picture the scene. I just had a new baby, my second son, Ben was just born. I am on the side of the road sobbing with a breast pump and a diaper bag in my passenger seat. I have returns for a new baby in the back seat of the car, because God forbid they have more than a 30-day return policy for clothes. I have a client contract on my lap with a pen, sort of a sticking me in the vagina as I'm trying to mark it up at every red light traffic stop. As I'm zooming to pick up my older son, Zach, who's about almost turning three at the time, in his toddler transition program.

Eve Rodsky:                           In America, since we really value working mothers, those programs are like 10 minutes long. So I was trying to zoom back and I was like, "Okay, I'm probably going to get into an accident if I'm crying, and my contract's going to get all runny." So I pulled over the side of the road, I just started crying. I knew I was going to be late to pick up Zach, but that was a day I always say, "Thank God Seth sent me that text." Still married. We're very happily married, thanks to Fair Play. But back then it felt like my breaking point, and I said to myself, you know, I'm done. This is not the career marriage combo I thought I was going to have.

Lauren Schiller:                  I'm Lauren Schiller and that is Eve Rodsky, the author of a new book, a revolution called Fair Play. We spoke on stage for Inforum at the Commonwealth Club of San Francisco this October, to a very lively house. What is this Fair Play you might ask? Well, here's what it's the opposite of.

Eve Rodsky:                           Second shift, mental load, emotional labor. But my favorite came out of a 1987 article by a sociologist named Arlene Kaplan Daniels, and her article is called Invisible Work. And why I love that one so much was because you can't value what you don't see.

Lauren Schiller:                  Eve set out to find out why women are what she calls the she-fault, for all things domestic and more to the point what can be done about it. This is Inflection Point with stories of how women rise up.

Eve Rodsky:                           I had women saying to me, WTF, I'm doing it all. Another woman said to me, "At this rate, after looking at this spread sheet I'm not going to stay in my marriage." And so I realized I had unleashed this rant without a solution. And every other book up until Fair Play, every other book had said, make a list. But there is a problem when you make a list sometimes, right? Because you enter consciousness. But if you don't have a solution, when you're woke and you just are sitting in that resentment, it actually can be worse before it gets better.

Eve Rodsky:                           And so that's where I realized I needed to put my mediator hat on and say, I do this for a living. I develop systems. I'm a Harvard trained mediator. I am product of a single mother who vowed this one happened to me. I went to my first equal rights amendment march when I was 15 months old. I was there.

Lauren Schiller:                  You were? Oh my God.

Eve Rodsky:                           We were there together. It was still happening to me. So I went on a quest to find out if that was true. And the good news for Fair Play, the bad news for society is that it was happening to lots of other women too.

Lauren Schiller:                  Yup. Well since you mentioned your mom and you mentioned that march, and maybe if I go back through old photos I can find you as an infant.

Eve Rodsky:                           Yeah, I have that photo.

Lauren Schiller:                  I was only like seven. But anyway tell us about your mom a little bit and growing up with her, and like what you used to do for fun on your birthday.

Eve Rodsky:                           Oh yeah. So my mother, we didn't have a lot of money for fancy birthday gifts. Even if we did, I'm not sure she would have given me any, because she doesn't really believe in possessions. But instead what we would do on my birthday, she said she would give me the gift of being the change I want to see in the world. That's the Gandhi quote. And so what we did was she said, I could look at anything I wanted, any civic engagement that was happening in Washington DC. We lived in New York City.

Eve Rodsky:                           And so around my birthday, she said she'd buy me a Greyhound bus ticket, and we'd pack lunch and we'd go down, and usually it was a march. So every year my birthday starting around seven, we'd go to Washington D.C. and we'd march for whatever social justice civic engagement thing was happening at the time. And I think it really impacted me because a, obviously it's this idea of not materialism b, it's this idea of birthdays, being gratitude for other people, but c, it was the camaraderie to understand that if you go and there's other people there, there's more people than you, who are caring about an issue and that leads you to do more.

Eve Rodsky:                           And so that was also like the beauty, my love letter to you. Fair Play is a love letter to women, and it's also become a love letter to men. Because I get to share your stories and that's sort of the beauty of the march of this idea that we're all in this together. And it was the cathartic thing for me was that, it wasn't just a me problem. My favorite sociologist C. Wright Mills says, "Private lives, public issues." And I realized this was a serious public issue, yeah.

Lauren Schiller:                  So in the start contrast to your moment on the side of the road, you tell a story in the book about being on an airplane and checking off this dude across the aisle. Can you share the story and kind of what epiphany that brought?

Eve Rodsky:                           Absolutely.

Lauren Schiller:                  We'll hear that story and more right after this short break.

Eve Rodsky:                           So the man on the plane, I call this case of the man on the plane. My cousin and I, right when I was discovering all these issues, getting to consciousness about what was happening, I was becoming the defaults. Or like I like to say in the book that she-falls, for every single thing for my household and family, regardless of whether we work outside the home, women do two thirds of what it takes to run a home and family regardless of whether we work outside the home. So before that was a statistic I was undeniably living, but I didn't know at the time.

Eve Rodsky:                           So around the time when I was undeniably living this, but didn't know it at the time, I was on a plane with my cousin, she was coming back to L.A., she was coming out for work. I was coming home from a work trip and we had our grab and go Chicken Caesar Wraps. We went to Hudson News to buy presents for the kids. The second we enter boarding area, DirecTV decides to call me. I'd forgotten I'd scheduled a satellite installation appointment from six months earlier. If anyone's ever dealt with ATT, you don't want to ever deal with not taking that satellite appointment.

Eve Rodsky:                           So I'm trying to install a satellite dish on FaceTime with these men at my house. My cousin at the same time, her phone blows up, her au pair didn't know where to go for soccer practice, and didn't have the cleats or the shin guard. So she's sending him back home. The au pair back home to get her stuff, and we're having this very interactive boarding session. As we get to our seats, my cousin, as I'm still on the phone with ATT, realizes she left her laptop bag back in the boarding area.

Eve Rodsky:                           So we're pushing through to try to get back off the plane. I'm screaming the whole, the plane, the first class flight attendants weren't that happy, that people all the way back in coach were trying to disrupt the first class passengers. She gets off the plane, we get back on the plane, and it was this collective staring at us like, "Ladies, get your shit together."

Eve Rodsky:                           Now on the other side of the plane where you're sitting, this man walks on and we became very interested in this man, because he's about our age. He just takes out a laptop. He literally has no luggage, and we see sort of his screensaver is a really cute brunette, and some kids on his screen saver and he just starts typing, just starts typing. And somehow he manages to finish a PowerPoint deck as we're in the air. And then my cousin keeps looking over and she's like, "What is he doing? He's like solving world peace. He's like solving like calculus."

Eve Rodsky:                           He was using this sort of weird grid, this geometric grid, and then he fell asleep. And then he was doing some candy crush on his phone and there was obviously no good movies on to be watched. We were just became sort of obsessed with him and about five hours into the flight from New York to L.A., my cousin just looks at me and says, "I just wish I was that man." And it was this idea, right, that what is the value of an unencumbered mind? It really is truly priceless. And Virginia Woolf talks about this, almost a hundred years ago that Shakespeare couldn't have been a woman because her mind is too encumbered.

Eve Rodsky:                           And so that really got me thinking about the cost of women, right? The cost of women, of being on our side of the plane, and the motherhood penalty for being seen as not having our shit together, and what the beauty is. And so that set off this idea of the pricelessness of an unencumbered mind. So then from there, my passion, what I call my unicorn space, became this idea of how do we get women, how do we get women to have less of an encumbered mind? We're never going to have a fully unencumbered mind, but even if it's a little less, even if there's one less satellite dish appointment, maybe we're just dealing with the au pair, it'll be a little bit better. Maybe I will have 20 minutes to play candy crush in the airport too.

Lauren Schiller:                  So in the book you talk about the difference between equal and equity.

Eve Rodsky:                           Yeah.

Lauren Schiller:                  Like that the goal is actually not... So all this stuff that we're responsible for, which, I mean that is a whole other conversation. It's like why are we the she-faults? Actually I'll just ask you that. Did you learn about that? Like why are we the she-fault?

Eve Rodsky:                           There's two phases... Well, I have three phases of research. So phase one was figuring out why we were the she-fault by going through every single article and book, because I'm a really good researcher. My college roommate can tell you that. That ever been written on the subject of what I call the she-fault. And it turns out that she-fault has a name actually many names, second shift, mental load, emotional labor. But my favorite came out of a 1987 article by a sociologist named Arlene Kaplan Daniels. And her article was called Invisible Work.

Eve Rodsky:                           And why I love that one so much was because you can't value what you don't see. So what if, and this was my first foray into this idea of the solution was, what if I made visible the invisible. And I finally showed Seth all that I do. And so that has led me on this mission to create what I call the Shit I Do spreadsheets. And it was a really fun exercise that took me months. But what it started with was me writing down every single thing I did that took more than two minutes, that have a quantifiable time component.

Eve Rodsky:                           So you can't quantify love, but you can quantify how long it takes you to buy the flowers for the recital. So that became gestures of love, in one of my Excel tabs, and slowly I started building and I don't know if any of you that use Excel, but it had 98 tabs, 20 items of sub tabs, over a thousand items of visible work. And then I sort of sent it to my friends to say what am I missing? And I had friends who say, "Well you forgot sunscreen." I say, well obviously you don't have to use Excel then, because it's tab 72, under medical and healthy living, you just didn't down to item 21, because it's there.

Eve Rodsky:                           Another woman who I didn't even know, literally a friend of a friend that found my list through the Jewish Federation in Arizona said that she noticed I didn't have allowance on there. And I said, "Well then you really don't know how to read Excel because it's under tab 55, it's under family values and traditions." It's item number seven because why else are you giving allowance unless it's to have some sort of family value. So I think they were like freaked out, but they were very happy that it was that thorough.

Eve Rodsky:                           And I finally get the courage after these months and months to send this 19 million megabytes spreadsheet off to my husband, with the very eloquent need or like perfect communicator in the subject line that said, "Can't wait to discuss," with no context other than that, and just send it off into the ether and waiting for his response. And I'm waiting and waiting, and I finally get Seth Rodsky, unread email in my inbox. I open up the email and it's just one monkey covering its eyes. That was that. I didn't even get the courtesy of the three monkey trio. So sad, just to see no evil.

Eve Rodsky:                           And so obviously in my household, right, this has triggered a see no evil reaction. That's where I realized I needed to put my mediator hat on and say, I do this for a living. I develop systems for very difficult families, and if that doesn't make sense to you, just picture the HBO shows succession. Those are my clients. You should feel bad for me. But the good news is that working with families like that, I've had a decade of experience in mediation and systems building around shared values.

Eve Rodsky:                           Where even the most difficult clients, who would literally storm out of the room, when their son would be speaking, can share and have communication with grace and humor and generosity around very difficult family issues. So if that can happen for those families, I thought, "Well why not bring the same systems learning into ordinary households?" And that's sort of how I started developing Fair Play. Yeah.

Lauren Schiller:                  Okay. So let's get to this equity question, versus equality question. Because I mean it seems like the very first place that you would go is like, okay, there are a hundred items on this list or a thousand items on this list or whatever it is for you or your family. So if I just give you, my partner, half of them, everything's good.

Eve Rodsky:                           Yeah.

Lauren Schiller:                  But you actually say that's not true. So talk about that a little bit.

Eve Rodsky:                           So the Shit I Do spreadsheet evolves over time into the 100 Fair Play cards. And what I found was, the science backs this up. 50/50 is the absolute wrong equation. And I actually think 50/50 has held us back for a 100 years, because it's never 50/50, and then when you think it's going to be, there's a lot of disappointment and resentment and on and on and on. So what I realized, and the science backs this up, is that perceived fairness is a better indicator than actual fairness, whatever that means in the home in terms of how you view your partnership.

Eve Rodsky:                           So my perceived fairness may look different Laura than your perceived fairness. But what it comes out of after doing all the research is ownership. And so what I mean by that is everything you sort of need to know about Fair Play, you sort of can learn from the life changing magic of mustard. And what I mean by that is somebody has to know your second son, Johnny, like spreads French's yellow mustard on his protein, otherwise he like gags on protein, right? So if he dips it in French's yellow mustard, he eats his protein. That's what I call conception.

Eve Rodsky:                           That's what organizational manager's called conception. Then somebody has to put it on a list, or notice that the French's yellow mustard is running low. That's what I called planning. Then someone actually has to get their butts to the store to purchase the French's yellow mustard. And that's what I call execution. And that's when men step in. And that's a big problem, because they always bring home spicy Dijon, the nasty scene, they just do. And then men all over the country are saying to me, "I'm never going back to the store for my wife, because I went to the damn store, I got the mustard and I can't ever do anything right."

Eve Rodsky:                           My love letter to men, women all over the country were saying things to me like, "Well what do you mean Eve? You want me to trust him with making our living will? He can't even bring home the right type of mustard." And so it led to this trust spiral, where women just kept on taking more and more and more back on their plates. So what happens when you own the full mustard situation? When the conception, planning, execution stays together, when you have context? Well, if I'm the one who notices that my son needs a mustard and plan for the mustard, and I execute mustard, then something beautiful happens. You actually bring home the yellow mustard.

Eve Rodsky:                           And so Fair Play is predicated on that notion of ownership. And so that's why I say it's not 50/50, because men are not taking 50/50 of the cards. Even stay at home dads often don't have 50 cards, but when you have ownership there's perceived fairness, and so back what I just said, perceived fairness is a better indicator of marital happiness, and that's what I kept seeing all over the country, when you own the mustard situation. And if you don't believe me and you say, "Well, yeah, right. That's definitely not how we do things in our family."

Eve Rodsky:                           I just say, "Let me stop you because the most successful organizations do it that way." Netflix calls it the RRP, the rare responsible person, where they're given context, not control, and you never wait to be told what to do. Apple coined the term DRI, which is a directly responsible individual, where you own a task from conception and planning to overseeing the execution. So I believe it's time to start treating our home with some respect and rigor. That our home is our most important organization, because who would ever walk into your boss's office and sit there and say, "So, hey, what should we be doing today? I'll just wait here to tell me what to do."

Eve Rodsky:                           You wouldn't have a job the next day. But that's how we're doing things in our home. So I'm asking people to just bring some respect, some rigor. Like I said, treat our home like an organization, because when you do, then things start to change.

Lauren Schiller:                  So what about the idea of who has more time? So you actually break down kind of three or so, maybe it's four categories of situations that women are in, why don't you say what the categories are. Because, you've got women who are working full time and you've got women who are staying at home, and somehow there seemed to be equally responsible for as long the same things. But this idea that especially the women who are staying home, by choice or otherwise, theoretically have more time.

Eve Rodsky:                           Well the first thing again is back to fairness, right? Fair Play is a very customizable situation. So my affair is not going to look the same as your affair. Again why I think 50/50 is the wrong equation, because what does 50/50 mean, in a stay at home marriage where maybe you are taking on more of the marriage, the responsibilities in the home. But back to your question Lauren, about time. So why is Fair Play not just a card game? I wish I could just like hand out decks. But what I realized was that, and you've said this a tone sort of switches.

Eve Rodsky:                           The first half of the book really it has to be some consciousness raising, and then you can go to the South Beach diet part where I give you like what to eat and when to eat it, and that's where men come in, because they do like the prescriptive stuff. But the beginning was so important because of my finding. I had this giant finding that I wasn't expecting, and it sort of predicates everything that comes after in Fair Play. And it was this idea that women and society view men's time as finite, like diamonds, and women's time is infinite like sand. So what do I mean by that?

Eve Rodsky:                           Well, men were saying things like, "My power hours, I make more money and she has more time." So we were hearing it from men that, we know that from equal pay, we go into the office for the same amount of hours. We're paid less for those hours. But what I didn't expect was that the worst purveyors of not valuing their time would actually be women. And so women all over the country were saying things to me like, "Of course I should pick up the extra slack in my home, because my husband makes more money than me," not true.

Eve Rodsky:                           Other women were saying to me, "I do more in the home because I'm just wired differently. I'm a better multi-tasker." So I went to the top neuroscientists in this country to find out that that's 100% not true. And one actually said to me, off the record, "Don't use this in the book, but you can use this on your tour. Imagine you can convince half the population that they're better at wiping asses and doing dishes. How great for the other half of the population." That's that multitasking message. Hence, there's a 100 CEO's in the Forbes list this month, and guess what they all have in common except for one, they all are men.

Eve Rodsky:                           Okay. Other women were saying to me, "In the time it takes me to tell him how to do it, I might as well do it myself." So I went to the top behavioral economists who think all only about longterm thinking, 1000% not true in terms of longterm planning and my favorite were the two people with the same job? Yeah, we're both colorectal surgeons. Yeah, we're both shipping supervisors, but my husband's really busy and overwhelmed and I just find the time. And so I like to say, unless we're somehow Albert Einstein and we know how to fuck with the space time continuum, we definitely can't find time.

Eve Rodsky:                           There's literally no way to find time. But there is time choice of how you use your time, and if I have less choice of over how or use my time, then my time is less valued. So having to break those down for women especially was really important. So a lot of the book is looking at our own views of how we view our own time. And so I like to say, imagine a world where we're all time is created equal, right? Where we actually really believe that an hour holding our child's hand in the pediatrician's office, is just as valuable as an hour in the board room.

Eve Rodsky:                           If that becomes true, then guess what? Men will be more likely to do it, and then we'll start having some real changes in those workplaces. So all time is created equal, that's where the fundamental premise came from.

Lauren Schiller:                  So I mean, that is a huge societal shift.

Eve Rodsky:                           Yeah.

Lauren Schiller:                  Right.? And you know, I guess change starts at home. Have you learned about how that might ultimately ripple out to being rewarded in our larger society? I mean what do you think needs to change kind of from other directions?

Eve Rodsky:                           That's a great question. I'll tell it to you. Can I tell a two minute story that actually illustrate some sort of change that's happening? So I'll tell you a story about my friend Julie and Ed, who wanted to try Fair Play around the holidays last year. It's a terrible time to try anything new. But this actually was after the manuscript was submitted. So you're hearing a story that's actually not in the book. So Ed is the type of guy who said things to me like, "I'm the CEO outside the home, and my wife's a CEO inside the home, so throw up."

Eve Rodsky:                           Okay. But that's Ed. I like him. That's sort of the way he came at this. And so Julie wanted to try Fair Play, because she was super overwhelmed, and she says to me, "My mom just entered the hospital. Ed says he wants to help. I'm taking the kids to school. I'm working part time. I'm still making their lunches. I'm trying to decorate the Christmas tree, try to do a holiday card, plan our Christmas travel, and I'm at my breaking point."

Eve Rodsky:                           So I said to her, "Well, what's breaking you?" And she said my second son, Brody, second grade secret Santa project, because it has to be made from scratch. I always say thank you to the schools. It's so nice to do that to us around the holidays. But they do. And so she said to me, "Well typically if I hadn't heard about your Fair Play concepts, I would just give Ed a list of all the things I need to get for me for the secret Santa project. And when I got home from sitting my mother in the hospital, I'd be building the project with Brody.

Eve Rodsky:                           But you're telling me not to do that. You're telling me to ask Ed, CEO outside the home to own the homework, this one homework projects for one day, one card for one day." I said, "Yes, I am asking you to do that." And so Julie said to me, "Well I wouldn't even know where to begin? Like that's completely not our habit." And she was sort of panicking, because she wouldn't have the tools to ask him to own the homework card for this project. So Fair Play at its core is really based on values. It's not a score keeping exercise where you throw cards at your partner.

Eve Rodsky:                           I asked you to back it up to what is your why. So I did that with Julie and I said "Why do you value this project? Let's just start with that. Why is this the project that's breaking you?" And so she said to me, "Well it's the signature second grade project, because we're supposed to be teaching our kids that Christmas is not about a $100 [inaudible 00:25:56]. It's about a lack of materialism and the fact that you can get a nice homemade gift that you actually are excited to open, means a lot to me in the school."

Eve Rodsky:                           Okay. I was feeling like that was a very articulate answer. And then she says, "On top of it, my son Brody drew the name of a new girl at school, and I watch her, I'm the one who drops off in the morning, because I have a part time job. And so I watch this little girl sort of walk around, and no one's really talking to her. And it would be really nice if my son who is popular and athletic and who has been at the school since kindergarten would make something really nice for this new girl. Like maybe would make her feel more welcome, and it would foster empathy for him."

Eve Rodsky:                           So I tear every time... You know, when she said that, I still tear up telling that story. So it felt very powerful to me. Her why. So I said, "Just say that to Ed. Just what you just said to me. When you're calm, not when you're feeling overwhelmed, but when you're calm, articulate that. Exactly what you just said to me. You say to him." So I was interviewing a lot of people at the time, so I almost forgot about checking back in with them. But I'm so happy I did because Ed gets on the phone and tells me that right after Julie told him that he began Googling secret Santa projects for little girls with his son Brody.

Eve Rodsky:                           Remember this is CEO outside the home guy, and that's what I call conception. Because they decided in a Popsicle stick jewelry box, and then he tells me that they start writing down on a list everything they need to build that project. So they wanted color, this is all Eds details. They wanted colored, Popsicle sticks, glue, glitter and Brody even wanted the little girl not to have to use two hands to open her jewelry box. So they were buying a knob for the box that was on their list.

Eve Rodsky:                           So that's what I call in Fair Play, the planning. And then Ed tells me that he found this really cool store named My Goals. And it wasn't even that difficult because you could just go to one store, and get everything you need. So wow, that sounds like a really cool store. And they go to My Goals, they pick up everything they need for this project and they come home. And they start building it. And so Julie chimes in and says, "Well, my life changed in that moment." And I said, "Well that's a pretty big statement. So what was changing for you in that moment?"

Eve Rodsky:                           And she said, when she saw Brody and Ed on the floor working on gluing these pieces together for this Popsicle stick jewelry box, that she noticed that Ed had glitter on his hands. And she said to me, I said, "Well, what was making that so meaningful to you? And she said, "Because it finally felt like he was in it with me. And because glitter is a fucking pain in the ass to get out and it's always in her hair and on her hands. And how cool if he actually gets it on his hand and here and realizes that."

Eve Rodsky:                           And so that sort of got me thinking right, about small micro changes. I didn't ask this man to take a 100 cards. I didn't even ask him to take homework for the year or the month. This was ownership of one card for one project, and his wife gave him trust to do it. And so imagine all men have glitter on their hands. Because back to what you said about societal change that starts in the home. So Ed's also a very high up position at a very important East Coast company. What if he recognizes that there's value in doing secret Santa projects?

Eve Rodsky:                           Maybe he'll let his employees leave earlier. Maybe he'll understand that women, their time matters, and so we should pay them the same. But I do think it all begins with glitter. Yeah.

Lauren Schiller:                  Okay. I actually have to ask you about the CEO of the home business, because I was just chatting with someone this weekend who said that that's what their tax advisor put down on her tax return as her title, and she was happy about it.

Eve Rodsky:                           Okay.

Lauren Schiller:                  But you're like, "Hmm, so what?" What is the downside of that?

Eve Rodsky:                           The downside of that is that it means that ownership of every single card is landing on the woman, and nobody can hold all the cards. I mean in single mother of households, yes, they do try to hold all the cards like my mother did, and stuff falls through the cracks. And there's societal issues, we're not valuing that. We could talk all day about single mothers, but if you have the solution, privilege, to have a partner at home, I say to you, "Nobody should be holding all the cards."

Eve Rodsky:                           And so again, what I found was that men like Ed... So let me just tell you another thing, one last thing about Ed that I don't often tell, but in this context I think it's important. He also told me that Brody, his son started crying in the car on the way back from My Goals, because he was sad his grandmother was in the hospital. And I think the reason Ed told me that, I don't want to put words in his mouth, but I want to go back and ask him. I think he told me that because he felt privileged that his son was finally confiding in him.

Eve Rodsky:                           And there's a connection there when your son's willing to be vulnerable and cry to you. And what does that do for him? And so people know, I love these types of stories. So I got a call two days ago from a client in Seattle, who told me he was at a funeral, not to get all existential. And he said, "You're going to love this story about the funeral." I said, "Well, that's really cool. You think I love stories about funerals. But tell me why I'm going to love this story." He said, "This man, again, very powerful man in my clients realm. My HBO says, you know, succession realm passed away.

Eve Rodsky:                           He wasn't my client, he was a friend of my client. And his daughter... So even though he was super powerful, I guess he was always a tooth fairy. He held the magical beings card for his kids, and his daughter read all of the poems she ever received from him as the tooth fairy at his funeral." And so I think about what is that for men? What do we care about at the end of our lives, right? We care about those things, those connections we make. And so I saw men who were getting ownership, not given a list, not what I call rat fucked, the random assignment of a task, but actually given ownership, they were getting more meaningful connections out of their family life.

Eve Rodsky:                           And so it's not good for men either to live in the CEO of the home CEO outside the home siloed living. Even if it's not, like I said, 50/50, trust in the home matters. When you're doing it together, I saw huge shifts in how people were interacting with each other and their children.

Lauren Schiller:                  I think it's worth spending a few minutes talking just functionally about how this works. Because I've been having fun pitching it to various people.

Eve Rodsky:                           I got my ambassador.

Lauren Schiller:                  And I'm like, "This is going to change everyone's life. It's going to change my life." But I was able to go to my husband and say, "Well I have to prepare for this interview. Right. So I need you to play this game with me. That's going to create more efficiency in the home." And I like watched to see what his reaction was. And I was like, "Or," because you've got several pitches that you can make to your partners. Right?

Eve Rodsky:                           Yeah.

Lauren Schiller:                  And I was like waiting to see which one he'd most respond to. Meanwhile, my 14-year-old daughter is listening in because she hears everything and she keeps asking me, "Mom, what's this game? Like are we ever going to play the game?" So I'm like ready to take a pack of cards.

Eve Rodsky:                           Yes. You're going to take on cards.

Lauren Schiller:                  So let's talk about you. I mean, you've obviously referenced the 100 cards and, a few of the different categories and that you need to have the concept planning and execution.

Eve Rodsky:                           Yeah.

Lauren Schiller:                  There's also things like minimum standard of care and all that. So could you just give a little rundown of how this game works?

Eve Rodsky:                           Yes. Remind me to get right back to that. Because you just said something important about communication.

Lauren Schiller:                  Okay.

Eve Rodsky:                           And then we'll get right to the practicality of it. So just one quick thing about how women communicate, and men too. So a lot of women out there were saying to me very powerful women even, and ones that again have less economic privilege that they can never have a conversation about these issues in the home. It's hard that they didn't want to bring it up, that this was too tricky. So one woman said that to me, and then completely unironically about 20 minutes later. She's like, "So yeah, it's when my husband didn't put the clothes in the dryer, I just dumped the wet clothes on his pillow."

Eve Rodsky:                           Another woman said the same thing. "I can't have a conversation about this in my home." But then I find out she has an Instagram account called the shit my husband doesn't pick up, and she takes pictures of all of it and she posts it on Instagram. So what I'd like to say to all you women and men out there, is I promise you, you are already communicating. I will go on your nest camera, watch you for a day, circle every single time you are communicating about home life. Even if I don't see your words coming out of your mouth, you are already communicating.

Eve Rodsky:                           So when I could say to women, you were having a conversation shift, but not a start. Women felt a little bit less scared to have these conversations. And so that is one way to do it. To say we're going to have a shift and not a start because we are already communicating about home life. Now another thing is if you need lots of tools, Fair Play gives you those tools. They give you all the mediation tools that I have out of my practice, but it's also again back to the work we have to do in ourselves, why Fair Play is not just a car game.

Eve Rodsky:                           I have a lot of quizzes in the book, not just on who said it when, but on what type of personality profile are you, what toxic type messages have you given yourself, and also what type of communication vulnerability do you have? So a big communication vulnerability that I had and a lot of women have in my data set, was they love to give feedback in the moment.

Lauren Schiller:                  Yeah.

Eve Rodsky:                           And so when emotion is high, cognition is low. When you're giving that feedback in the moment, it's super unhelpful, but we love to do it. So my editor laughed at me because I had about 20 pages of explaining to women why not to give feedback at the moment from a neuroscientist perspective, from a psychologist, from me, from clergy. And so she said, "I get it that you really want to get this point across, that you have to hold your tongue to a time when emotion is low and cognition is high. But we can't spend 20 pages dissecting this. They're just going to have to believe you with three supporting experts."

Eve Rodsky:                           So it's about four pages in the book of that point. And so you have to start with using tools, sitting down, communicating at a time where you're calm, and that's where the cards help. So back to the practicalities. So if you're communicating, and not giving feedback in the moment, and you're sitting down, when you're calm, what happens is you have a full set of tools, right? Your brain is in a place that can have conversations that are more than just take the damn dishes card, because I never want to do dishes again. That's when Fair Play fails. And that's sort of the beauty of why this took me seven years. It was all to get to the last chapter of the book, which is called the top 13 mistakes couples make and the Fair Play fix.

Eve Rodsky:                           Because I needed to have testing subjects from all walks of life that mirrored the U.S. Census to get a sense of what was tripping people up. So you get to read about all the people's mistakes and how to correct them. But a big mistake was jumping right to the division, because it just became another list. So I did that. That was my first mistake, before I used my own mediation training to sort of develop the system. I just sort of had this game of fight idea, and I gave Seth the garbage card.

Eve Rodsky:                           And so what started happening was I started just following him around the house, sort of as his shadow. I even like opened the door under the sink to just remind him that that's where the garbage liners were. And so he could like trip over it as he was trying to get a snack. And he stopped me one day and said like, "This garbage thing is not working because you're literally stalking me over garbage, and I'm not going to own anything if this is what it feels like to own, something because you're literally stalking me over garbage."

Eve Rodsky:                           So this is my own mistake of just jumping straight to the division. So that's when I had a backup and say, My entire mediation practice for decade is based on values based mediation, where I ask people what is their why? So why am I not bringing that into the system? Well, it's because it's a really weird conversation to talk about your values over garbage, who does that? But what I found was that when you do that, it brings transformative change into the home, transformative change that lasts. And so that's what I started doing.

Eve Rodsky:                           I sat down and said, "So let me tell you why I value garbage. As you know, you went to my house, you saw my apartment on Avenue C in 14th street look like, you saw the Chinese takeout bag that sat on a knob. You saw that there was no garbage can in my house growing up." What happened was garbage would spill on the floor every single day. It would have this little bag, it would overflow. And so I was a very dehydrated child, because after sundown I was afraid to turn on the light in the kitchen, because we have cockroaches and water bugs that would just scatter everywhere.

Eve Rodsky:                           So I'm extremely triggered by garbage. But I'd never thought to tell Seth that. And so we sat down and I told him the story of my upbringing, and then he responds by saying, "Well, I slept on a Domino's pizza box as my pillow, my whole fraternity life. So I don't really care about garbage. I actually like garbage. It doesn't bother me." And so what happens, right when you have such different values over something as simple as garbage. Well then you borrow what I did from the law and from medicine, and you come up with what's reasonable, a minimum standard of care.

Eve Rodsky:                           And that's what we did. So I said to Seth, he said, "I will hold this card. And what feels reasonable to me is if garbage goes out once a day, and I will take it out once a day at 7:00 PM. I'll put it in my calendar like a work appointment, as long as you never fucking mention the word garbage ever again." And ever since that day, garbage goes out at 7:00 PM, and sometimes we re-deal when he's not home, and we take other cards. But that's what happens. 20 minute conversation. You invest in those conversations, and it's a lifetime of change.

Eve Rodsky:                           And so when women say, "Well, I don't want to spend 20 minutes talking about garbage." I love to just grab their phones, and I go to their screen time app, and I promise you they've been on Instagram or Facebook longer than 20 minutes. Invest in your partnerships, treat the homeless some respects because it pays off spades. I really believe change starts in the home. Yeah.

Lauren Schiller:                  Well one of the things that I was really excited about in reading this book was, aside from the very obvious benefits, is this notion of unicorn time, and that that gets to be a card. And when I saw your book, I'm like, "What's this little unicorn doing on that scale there?" So can you explain what you mean by that and let's talk about it.

Eve Rodsky:                           Yeah. It's this idea of unicorn time, unicorn space. I call it that because it's like the mythical equine, it's this beautiful creative space, that we used to have before kids and partnerships. But it doesn't freaking exist, unless we reclaim it. So it's really this idea and it changed the way I wrote the book. I really am an organization manager. I'm a mediator. I get to the presenting problem, the underlying problems. But what stopped me, which kept pulling me back into the fact that this was bigger than just a game, was not only the toxic time message we were giving ourselves, it was the identity loss that was being reported in so many women after children.

Eve Rodsky:                           I don't know who I am anymore. One woman who had three Ivy league degrees said to me when I said, what is your unicorn space? What is your creative space that makes you uniquely you, and how do you share that with the world? She said, "I don't even understand what that question means. It's physics." I said, "What do you mean?" She said, "Well, I'm an object at rest. Object in motion stay in motion, objects in rest stay at rest, and I'm object at rest. I won't even know how to answer that question."

Eve Rodsky:                           And why that was so important. It was because I asked a very provocative question of men. I asked men all over this country, are you proud of your wife, of your wife or your partner? Men always went to, "She's an amazing mother." Okay. I said, "That's great. That's a role." And then they said, "I couldn't do it without her." I said, "That's great. That's a personal assistant, so tell me more." If a woman had her self-worth, something that made her, her, right? Whether it's volunteering with the firefighters, like one woman I interviewed who does American Ninja warrior, or for me the gender division of labor, or baking pies or whatever it is, then the man immediately went to that.

Eve Rodsky:                           It was never like, "Oh, she's an amazing dental hygienist." One guy said to me, "The dental hygienist husband, my wife's perfecting rhubarb," and he went off for 15 minutes about how hard rhubarb is to work with. Because she wants to add rhubarb to her pie collection that she's going to enter in some contest. I don't bake myself like that, but I guess apparently rhubarb gets very runny, and so you have to like perfect it when you're baking. But this man knew so much about rhubarb, because it was his wife's passion. He was picking up on her passion.

Eve Rodsky:                           And so I said it's not about a shaming ourselves to say our spouses need to be proud of us, but it's about us being proud of ourselves. Feeling a little bit like we were here, before we had these roles of being parent, partner and worker. And it really, really affects women and men too. There were some men who said, "I really need to find my unicorn space," as well completely we both need it, and we can't resent our partners for taking it.

Eve Rodsky:                           So I'll just end on that. That's my Harper's Bazaar article, you can look out for it. It's called the Real Midlife Crisis. What happens when the person who loves you the most resents you the most? Because my finding was the three things that most people said made them happy, were adult friendships, self care, true self care, not CBD oil pedicures, but like working out, or walking to the beach with your dog and unicorn space. Those were the three things that we didn't want to give our spouse anytime for.

Eve Rodsky:                           So it's not about breast implants or a Ferrari, it's about bringing back in our happiness trio, which starts with unicorn space, in saying that we all value this. I deserve this as much as you do, even if it's unpaid. And that was the hardest for stay at home mothers, because they said to me, I'm already doing all this unpaid work. How can I add in baking pies on top of that? But they have to, because it's about your marriage. And then what I found out from the research is also about our longevity.

Eve Rodsky:                           It's about our longevity, being who we are and being able to share that with the world and a little, even if it means just like bringing a pie to your neighbor, that is about our longevity.

Lauren Schiller:                  And it's also just about being interesting. You talk about being interesting in the book, interesting to yourself and-

Eve Rodsky:                           You have a right to be interested in your life.

Lauren Schiller:                  Yeah.

Eve Rodsky:                           You have a right to be interested in your own life. And so many women said to me, "I don't feel I have that right to be interested in my own life anymore."

Lauren Schiller:                  All right.

Eve Rodsky:                           Sorry to end on such a downer. The good news is that the after, which is a sequel that I'm writing now, is all these women and men who rediscovered their unicorn space, and it's the most inspiring thing to watch.

Lauren Schiller:                  I just have to say, I feel like it is... how many people here would say they have unicorn space? You know, something that they really value and they get time to do. That's awesome. I mean, is that a good percentage?

Eve Rodsky:                           That's great. I love this room.

Lauren Schiller:                  That's right.

Eve Rodsky:                           40% of the room.

Lauren Schiller:                  Keep doing. Yeah. Yeah. So for those of you who don't, there's a little workbook.

Eve Rodsky:                           Workbook and how to get it back. But I will say that, when I was in blueberries time, right, when I was sobbing on the side of the road, anytime someone would forward me a find your passion and you know article, I would say that's just another fucking thing. I don't have time to do. So thank you for shaming me. You wanted me to have self care. Great. Then you take my kids to school and try to mark up a contract with a pen in your vagina. You try to get some self care time.

Eve Rodsky:                           So I found these very condescending messages to women along with lower your standards, all these other messages I could tell you about all night, because it's just putting more shit on us. So I only believe in unicorn space in the context of domestic rebalance, only in that context. Alone, it's just another thing on our list of shit we don't have time to do.

Lauren Schiller:                  That was Eve Rodsky, author of Fair Play, a game changing solution for when you have too much to do and more life live. Speaking with me, live on stage at Inforum at the Commonwealth Club of San Francisco. I'll put a link to Eve's book on my website, inflectionpointradio.org, where you can find future events by clicking on the events tab. Come on out. I'm Lauren Schiller, this is Inflection Point and this is how women rise up.

Lauren Schiller:                  Today's program was produced in part by the generous donation of Gabriel Howard and Martin Scoble. That's our inflection point for today. All of our episodes are on Apple podcasts, RadioPublic, Stitcher, Pandora, NPR One, all the places. Give us a five star review and subscribe to the podcast.

Lauren Schiller:                  Know a woman leading change we should talk to? Let us know at inflectionpointradio.org. While you're there, support our production with a tax deductible monthly or one-time contribution. When women rise up, we all rise up. Just go to inflectionpointradio.org. We're on Facebook and Instagram at Inflection Point Radio. Follow us and join the Inflection Point Society, our Facebook group of everyday activists who seek to make extraordinary change through small daily actions. And follow me on Twitter at L-A-Schiller.

Lauren Schiller:                  To find out more about today's guest, and to be in the loop with our email newsletter, you know where to go, inflection pointradio.org. Inflection point is produced in partnership with K-A-L-W 91.7 FM in San Francisco, and P-R-X. Our community manager is Alaura Weaver. Our engineer and producer is Eric Wayne. I'm your host Lauren Schiller.

Announcer:                           Support for this podcast comes from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

 

2019.10.16_Eve+Rodsky+30_JM.jpg

How Tiffany Shlain Turns Off Tech to Turn On Creativity and Activism

LISTEN ON: APPLE PODCASTS | STITCHER | PANDORA | SPOTIFY | NPR ONE | MORE

Tiffany Shlain is the author of "24/6. The Power of Unplugging One Day a Week". She is also the founder of the Webbys, Character Day (where you can find her Tech Shabbat challenges) and the creator a number of films. In today's episode Tiffany brings it all together. You'll hear how taking time off from technology and taking time to reflect helps fuel your creativity and activism.

TiffanyShlain.jpg

TRANSCRIPT. We do our best, please forgive or let us know about any errors.

Tiffany Shlain:                      My name is Tiffany Shlain and I'm a filmmaker. I founded the Webby Awards and I just finished my first book that came out called 24/6: The Power of Unplugging One Day a Week. And it's about my family's decade-long practice of turning off all screens from Friday night to Saturday night for what my family calls our technology Shabbat and how much it's made our life better. And then Saturday is just literally everybody's favorite day of the week. We just, we hang out, we cook, we nap, we read, we journal, we space out. It's literally everybody's favorite day.

Lauren Schiller:                  Today, Tiffany Shlain tells us all how to step away from our screens just one day a week. But why would you do that?

Tiffany Shlain:                      It's good to have a day where you're, I can be reachable to the entire every news headline, every family member, every text alert. It's actually that's what have, I love being available to them the other days, but I need a day to just ground myself.

Lauren Schiller:                  What was the inspiration to take this break from technology?

Tiffany Shlain:                      I had this really intense year where my father was diagnosed with brain cancer and I found out I was pregnant in the same week. And those nine months, I thought a lot about life and death and what are we doing when we're here. And whenever I visit my dad who was quite sick, I would turn off my phone of course. And then he passed away and my husband's, and my daughter was born days later and we just knew we just wanted to change the way we're living.

Tiffany Shlain:                      And then shortly after that, we're part of this group called Reboot, and they had a national day of unplugging, which was one ceremonial day a year of turning off the screens, national day of unplugging. We did it and they asked us to write something for it, and it was this really wonderful night. And the next day, it just felt so good. No screens, it was this cleanest day, it was the longest day. It was the most present and happiest I'd been in a long time and we never stopped doing it.

Tiffany Shlain:                      So now it's been almost 10 years and the benefits just get. I see them more clearly and they just multiply and amplify. Just in terms of my sense of creativity, I feel very creative both on Tech Shabbat because I'm just, my mind is wandering and the next day is probably my most productive day of the week is Sunday and I laugh a lot more. I just feel I'm there for the funny, I'm just present for life more, feel more connected to myself, to my kids, my husband. It's this day every week that is so important to us and grounds us and even my teenage daughter, she is in her junior year of high school, which is super stressful. And in the last month because she knows she just started school.

Tiffany Shlain:                      She has commented I think each Saturday, I'm so glad I have this day. There's no homework, there's no being on, she gets to kind of reset and regroup, which we're not giving ourselves any time for it anymore. And especially with the news and we're waking up to the stressful news. We're going to bed with the stressful or FOMO or this or that or whatever mishmash of things you get on your phone. And so in the book I really talk about how much it's changed us and it has this ripple effect to the other six days because I've incorporated all these kind of smaller things into the week to not have the screen dictate my every move. And I was starting to feel like a marionette also, but the book also talks about kind of the history of time on time off the concept of a day of rest and all different cultures and why we need to bring this ritual back.

Lauren Schiller:                  So when does Saturday night end or are people sitting around waiting for midnight?

Tiffany Shlain:                      No It's funny we... If you are an observant Orthodox Jew, you wait till three stars are in the sky but for us it would be the three closing screens, no it's five o'clock so 5:00 PM Ken and I get ready to go out on a date and the girls get ready for what they call their double date with technology. And this is the great thing is that not only do I run towards Friday night, turning off the screen each week and everyone does, but on Saturday night you reappreciate the marvels of this miraculous tool called the web and technology all over again. So sometimes I extend it, but a lot of times I, there's something I wanted to look up the head to ponder all day. The pondering is actually quite delightful I think we've forgotten how to do that. Not be able to look something up immediately, but so it has this dual effect each week where I both can't wait to get off the screens and then I reappreciate what they can do when I come back on at five.

Lauren Schiller:                  I'm Lauren Schiller this is Inflection Point, I love this idea of taking a day off of screens and I thought you might like it too. So next up Tiffany Shlain tells us how to start our own Tech Shabbat, stick around. I'm back with Tiffany Shlain let's just start with how do you pitch this to your family?

Tiffany Shlain:                      This is the question. Do not say to your kids, we're going to turn off screens one day a week, they might start crying no one's going to want that.

Lauren Schiller:                  No one wants that.

Tiffany Shlain:                      Here's what you say. Tip number one, ask every member of your family, including yourself. What do you wish you had more time to do? Everyone's got a list, I mean everybody has a list. Why do you wish you could do more of, is it skateboarding? Is it painting? Is it reading? Is it napping? Is it hanging out with your friends? What's the list? Everyone write their own list and you fill your day with that. It'll become everyone's favorite day of the week. So it's not what you aren't getting it's what you get back. And that's a whole framing because I think people are so attached to their phones for everything, which I think is problematic and kind of reminds people to even jog their mind of all the pleasures in life that don't require a screen.

Tiffany Shlain:                      So that's exercise number one. What are those things that you love doing? Think back when you were younger, what did you like doing, what do you want more of? And then make the day pretty much all of that and it's just, there's so many things that are pulled away from the screen, you're in a moment, whether it's reading and then you're reading and then it makes you think of something on your phone and then your phone and you're on Instagram and you're off the book. I could say that sentence with everything. So I think it's a framing thing. It's that we need to remind people how incredible it is to be human and to be really present for the people right around you instead of the people in the phone or the things happening in the phone.

Lauren Schiller:                  I feel I do have a bad habit of when my kids come home and I'm on my computer, my kids come home and on my phone and then I get mad at them for being on their phone when I'm trying to have a conversation with them some modeling.

Tiffany Shlain:                      That's why this is really good, it's modeling and we made this film called Dear Parent, which I don't know if you saw it, it's a two minute film. It is so much about modeling behavior and a lot of kids do say their parents are the one, just the culprits too. So if you make it like a family experiment and I mean I always wish when my kids see me on the computer and I'm working, you wish there was a light blinking above your head. Actually I'm working right now, I'm helping to pay for the bills I'm not just scrolling away.

Tiffany Shlain:                      But it is about it being an all in family thing. And I think that's a key part of the toolkit is that everyone has to be in and you're going to have your own rules. I think part number two about rules, so for us it is the screens or the conduit to every distraction and work and all the mishmash of things. So, and we really like kicking it off with a dinner and that's also fun. Who do you wish you spend more time with? Who do you wish you saw more? Everyone's got that list oh, I wish I hang out with that person more. What's a neighbor you want to know better? Who do you want to spend time with that you're not distracted by the phones. And it is such a different experience when phones aren't on your lap in your pocket.

Tiffany Shlain:                      It's a whole different dinner, it's people are really there they're not half there. And then we've done it with two kids in soccer, we've done that unfortunately they're not both in soccer right now. But you can do it with making plans you have to do a little prep in the Friday afternoon.

Lauren Schiller:                  So do you put the word out ahead of time, is there an auto reply or something?

Tiffany Shlain:                      I have some haxe on our website for the book and with all these resources is 24sixlife.com and there are some haxe to put auto responses on your text message. You know how when you get the do not disturb I'm driving, you can actually set that to go. I don't have it on my email because people know I usually do a tweet, I'm on Twitter, that's my preferred social media.

Tiffany Shlain:                      I usually will on Friday night say turning off screens for my weekly ritual see you on under the tide just kind of remind people they can do that too. And then we invited everyone to try it on mass and we have so many resources for people now on our site and with all these kind of research and short films and ways to get people on board and tips to prepare for your Tech Shabbat. And it is kind of an amazing thing that we need this much to unplug from the network for one day a week I mean the irony is not lost.

Lauren Schiller:                  It's begging for a camping trip, the inflatable bed.

Tiffany Shlain:                      And I think it's about just remembering our humanity that we're so often. I walked down the street and everyone's looking down and I listen, it's not I have digital perfection down the other six days I actually think it's harder. I do a lot of mini things the other six days I don't look at my phone when I wake up anymore and that's hard. But I'm don't look at that phone and I get my coffee and I journal, I do a five minute journal. We're talking it's a 10 minute experience that I'm not on my phone but it sets my day in such a different way. But I think it's harder during the week to do all those, don't have it at the dining room table at my film studio no phones on the desks anymore. It is too distracting, so it's in your bag until you go to the bathroom and check it on a break.

Tiffany Shlain:                      But on my Tech Shabbat, the phones away because it's the visual, even seeing someone else's phone on a table when you're having lunch, it could be off it's their phone. You're not as present because you're looking at their phone, which could ring and it reminds you of your phone, which maybe is in your bag, whatever.

Tiffany Shlain:                      So we just don't realize how much we are pulling ourselves away from just being where we are. So I think it's actually of course I know people have so much fear around it. I think if people just layered it back and reframed it, as I said from this more positive space, it is literally something I run towards now. I'm I can't wait for it. And I feel I just remember how to live in a different way. They say for creativity, I mean, you do so much creative work and it's good to put your mind in a different mode, even if it's just one day a week and every week it just feels this very deep relaxation and different mood that kind of carries me over to the next week.

Tiffany Shlain:                      And listen, there's a handful of times a year where I'm traveling, I can't do it. And I feel unmoored I just don't feel quite as solid. I feel oh, I didn't get it.

Lauren Schiller:                  Well you talk, there's a chapter in the book that talks about creating rules and breaking them?

Tiffany Shlain:                      You're going to find your own rules, for a while we only listened to Vinyl on a record play, which is really fun, but we really like to cook on our Tech Shabbat. I don't have time to cook during the week as much as I on the weekend. And we started using Alexa as our timer, we have an echo Alexa verbal speaker now, for us that counts.

Tiffany Shlain:                      That's okay because it's not a screen, I literally say Alexa set the cooking timer for 10 minutes, but I'm not on a screen. If I did it on my phone then I'd get a text and an Instagram and a notification and I'd be off. So for us, we still listen to Vinyl but we also use that as [inaudible 00:11:29]. So that's our rule, I mean you're all going to come up with your own rules. And I have a friend who has special needs child and she was saying I have to be available and a grown child, and I was, what if you got a flip phone that was like your bat phone for that day to kind of force you to just communicate in a different way. So you were always available even if you're out of your house but you weren't mindlessly scrolling being distracted from everything.

Tiffany Shlain:                      So I think you really need to look at what your family, in the book I have talked about, if you're single, if you're older, I don't know one person in my life or I've talked to so many people about the book that doesn't feel they're on the screens too much. So how do you build this? It's a very old from our people practice. Again I'm not religious but I love going deep on the cons it was such a radical idea. A day of rest it put a period time was ongoing there was no ending and it was a day of rest. It's the fourth commandment above, do not commit murder is after six days you shall rest for a whole day. That', a huge thing to say. So it's such deep wisdom and it's thousands of years old.

Tiffany Shlain:                      It's free, it's available to everyone. And I do meditation and yoga and I don't consider myself Hindu or Buddhist, but these are practices that bring great balance back into my life. And I would love for people to engage with a full day of Shabbat because then again, most Jews I know that did Shabbat, maybe they do a Friday night dinner. That's probably the most, but the only people I knew that did a full day were Orthodox Jews. And I was always marvel, you don't drive, you don't use money, you don't wow. That's, so I was marveled at it, but I think that it's not for me, but I think in this modern era, I don't know anyone that doesn't feel they're on their phones too much. So how do we bring a very old practice into the 21st century and make it work?

Tiffany Shlain:                      So getting back to your rules question, I think if you kind of, and we have a series of exercises in the book to kind of walk you through the questions, how many hours do you think you're on a day? When does it not feel good? When does it feel good? I mean, there's lots of times I love the work I do and these global conversations as the best of you get a text from an old friend or there's so many incredible moments. You look something up and you go down this whole beautiful rabbit hole of ideas. There's so many goods, but it just seems it's infiltrated every part of our lives and it doesn't feel good. And so all day long when you feel a marionette doll, which I feel there are thousands of behavioral scientists and engineers, their job is to keep your eyes glued on the screen.

Tiffany Shlain:                      So when you feel you can't take your eyes away from that screen, it's because that is an intention. So to kind of reclaim yourself one day a week it gives me perspective, every week I really get to detach and think about what's happening and how I can try to help change it. Because there's stuff on a personal level, there's in your family you can model behavior and your kids are living in your house until they're 18 you run the household, you can set some new frameworks and at your company you could say, hey let's put our phones away from our desks let's try this. And then there's some legislation that's coming out we're doing these short films, dear parents, they're all two minutes. To your student, to your CEO, to your legislator and to your fellow human, and they're all approaching this idea from these different perspectives.

Lauren Schiller:                  You got to talk about the things that you need. What are the tools that you need? [crosstalk 00:14:48].

Tiffany Shlain:                      And remember what it was like landline. First of all, landlines are very inexpensive, and how much is your sanity worth? They're good for real emergencies. I mean, we've got earthquakes they're really good if there's a real emergency, they're good if you want to find your lost cell phone and they're really good if somebody really needs to get in touch with you on your Tech Shabbat. So landline I just think is really good to have. If you don't have a printer that might be good but I've also just written things by hand, when we did have two kids in soccer, so Friday afternoon I look at what's happening Saturday, which fields are that? I would remind the team just to reminder, we're not on screens, we'll meet you there.

Tiffany Shlain:                      That's how it used to exist before cell phones, before everyone would be I'm 10 minutes late, I'm around the corner, I'm parking, who cares? We don't need the updates. So especially like the most profound fact I found during researching the book was that it takes 23 minutes to get back into flow after you've been distracted by a notification or a text. So just imagine how much we're taking people out of their moment every single day. So I text a lot less since I've written this book. So Friday afternoon I do a little prep and it's not much just write it and keep it on the counter with a sharpie. I love writing with a sharpie and that is also good for Friday night when there's inevitably things I'm, oh I forgot to do and just all the things that tumbled from your head just to have a place to put them. There'll be there on Sunday for you to deal with, so you just remind people and then you know remind people of your landline and you are liberated and set free. I think people forget how good it feels to not be so reachable.

Lauren Schiller:                  When we come back Tiffany Shlain tells us how to get into the habit of taking 24 hours away from our screens and how it will help us all be better at leading change support inflection point with a tax deductible donation toward our fundraising goal at inflectionpointradio.org just click the support button. We'll be right back with Tiffany Shlain.

Lauren Schiller:                  Lauren Schiller:                  Am back with Tiffany Shlain. I'm just going to make the leap of faith that most of the people that are listening to this cares deeply about, feels needs to change feels we need to make progress on and that there's not a moment to spare.

Tiffany Shlain:                      But here's the thing, by taking a day for yourself, you're going to be that much more able to do your activism. I remember after the election, I mean you were doing so many women's rights issues and so much stuff and I was exhausted a year in exhausted by Trump, exhausted by it all and I had to re master my strength and on my Tech Shabbats', I feel you have to be able to recharge. This is a long fight, this is a lot of not even, I don't want to use the word fight because issues around the environment that's long term behavioral change, women's rights that is longterm changes.

Tiffany Shlain:                      These are all marathons and if we're running a million miles an hour, 24 seven activism you're never going to recharge and you're not going to be as effective. And I come up with my best ideas, I do a lot of activist films on my Tech Shabbat because I've pulled away from all the noise and I can think we're not giving ourselves space to think. There's a quote it's something about, it was again with the women's movement, you have to find the joy that you can't it's exhausting and it can be, I mean you have to find the joy in life to keep going and I find most of my joy on these Saturdays and then I feel completely recharged to fight for the... I'm not usually out in nature, so I'm appreciating nature. I'm seeing that I get perspective on women's rights, on our government issues.

Tiffany Shlain:                      I just get the perspective, I don't feel I have the other six days. So, and then lastly I'll say that if everyone took a Tech Shabbat day off, from consuming maybe we'd, that would be one great step for the climate change crisis. We're all consuming and doing 24 seven and that's also not that healthy for crop or for ourselves. And I think it'd be better why is 24 seven our goal, why is growth always our goal doing more and more.

Lauren Schiller:                  You are sending out a series of emails leading up to character day many challenges. Could you just review what each of those three or four of them?

Tiffany Shlain:                      They're still available. And this is something that we're, we're having these resources up all year round. So if you wanted to step in and go, okay, I want to try this.

Tiffany Shlain:                      By yourself or with your family, whatever. It's an eight week program in total on the first week was don't look at your phone when you wake up, 15 to 30 minutes, replace it with something else you love and again it's not the year without, it's what you get back. So before you go to bed, before you go to sleep and at meals, put the phone away. So I was challenged number one, and then the second week was go and walk without your phone for 30 minutes. I know that sounds hard, but it's so great once you're ah, I am without my phone, I am no one's tracking me. No one can find me am just with myself. So that was week two, and then the third week was how do you cultivate your character online and off.

Tiffany Shlain:                      So really start to think about where your dad is going, how do you know if something's accurate? What is the effect on you when you're only reading negative news, which is the majority of news activating your amygdala, how can you do other things? So really how do you bring your best self when you are online? And then the fourth week because the Tech Shabbat challenge a whole day with yourself or family. It's good to have a buddy have somebody a squad do it with you for a day, but the key thing is not just about one day is put in your schedule four weekends in a row because building any habit you have to, it's the ritual of it. To me, the power is that we do this every week, go completely off and see how that feels and I promise you it's the best thing I've ever done in my life and I love the web, but we can't lose our humanity when we're using it.

Tiffany Shlain:                      I feel people don't make eye contact anymore. They're just grunting their way and scrolling it, they literally I remember it was gauche when you in pull out your phone, you're talking to someone now everyone does it. It's always at the table. It's what's important to us and let's think 10 years into the future, if we keep going in this direction, it's going to be the movie Wally. And is that what we want? I used to be a smoker, which I'm not proud of, but I came from a doctor's family, so I was rebelling and who would've thought, I mean everyone used to smoke in San Francisco and I would have never thought that no one hardly smokes anymore.

Tiffany Shlain:                      But it was a combination of laws and awareness and not coolness and everything. And then the behavior changed and I'm not completely equating smart funnies because of course smartphones brings so many good things but the habits around them are ridiculous right now. So the pendulum has swung so far, so just try this very simple practice to bring it a little back and I promise you it's going to make you feel better about the way you're living.

Lauren Schiller:                  That was Tiffany Shlain, author of 24/6: The Power of Unplugging One Day a Week to find films, resources, and research about how technology is rewiring our brains and what it's doing to teens and youth plus to find the rest of the weeks of the Tech Shabbat challenge, we'll put a link to Tiffany's website, characterday.org on our website along with the link to her book. It's all at inflectionpointradio.org I'm Lauren Schiller. This is Inflection Point and this is how women rise up.

Lauren Schiller:                  That's our inflection point for today. All of our episodes are on Apple podcasts, RadioPublic, Stitcher, Pandora, NPR One, all the places. Give us a five star review and subscribe to the podcast. Know women leading change we should talk to let us know@inflectionpointradio.org while you're there, support our production with a tax deductible monthly or one-time contribution. When women rise up, we all rise up. Just go to inflectionpointradio.org we're on Facebook and Instagram at inflectionpointradio. Follow us and join the inflection point society, our Facebook group of everyday activists who seek to make extraordinary change through small daily actions and follow me on Twitter @laschiller. To find out more about today's guest and to be in the loop with our email newsletter you know where to go inflectionpointradio.org. Inflection Point is produced in partnership with KALW 91.7 FM in San Francisco and PRX. Our community manager is Alaura Weaver, our engineer and producer is Eric Wayne. I'm your host Lauren Schiller.

Speaker 3:                              Support for this podcast comes from the corporation for public broadcasting.

 

Paid Leave For All - Katie Bethell is Seizing the Moment to Fight for Radical Policy Change

America is one of only two countries in the world where you can be fired for taking a day off in order to give birth (let that sink in for a moment). As it stands, paid leave policy varies from company to company, state to state, but on a national level, there is no policy in place, no minimum requirements or baseline standard that applies to everyone.

And it’s not just about moms—this lack of policy also has greater repercussions for how we define a family, in a political sense, and the relationship between the family and the workplace--men included. Senators Elizabeth Warren and Kirsten Gillibrand are both bringing attention to these issues, running on platforms of universal childcare, and paid medical and family leave.

Katie Bethell, founder and executive director of Paid Leave for the US (PLUS), joins us this week to give us the alarming stats, talk nerdy government logistics, and offer some extremely practical advice on how we can use this particularly potent moment to push for political change.

Join us this week on Inflection Point for a look at radical change in action, one decision at a time.

Inflection Point is independently produced and we rely on support from listeners like you! Make a tax deductible donation to support our production today at inflectionpointradio.org/contribute. Thank you!

Photo courtesy of Paid Leave for the US

Photo courtesy of Paid Leave for the US

A radical shift in how we raise and treat boys - Dr. Michael Reichert

Last season on Inflection Point, we explored the concept of empowerment for women. And one of the many things we learned is that we can’t move the women’s movement forward, and we can’t hope to achieve equality if only one gender is doing the work. And since I recorded that episode a new report came out from the American Psychological Association about the harms of ‘traditional masculinity.’ What else needs to change in our culture, to enable boys and men to see women as their equals, and for women to see men as our allies?

My guest today is Dr. Michael Reichert, a psychologist with a specialty in work with men and boys, author of the new book, “How to Raise a Boy. The Power of Connection to Build Good Men” and the co-founder and Executive Director of the Center for the Study of Boys' and Girls' Lives, which is connected to the University of Pennsylvania. The study of gender--especially masculinity--as a social construct is "radical" because it challenges the entrenched belief that “boys will be boys.” But it turns out that boys--like most humans--are just really really good at adapting to their environment...an environment we adults create for them.

So...while we are spending lots and lots of time and energy ‘empowering’ women---are we writing off the good that men are capable of because we believe ‘that’s just how they are’ or can we help empower men as well--but in a new way? That will take a radical shift in thinking.

Resources:

https://www.nami.org/Learn-More/Public-Policy/Mental-Health-in-Schools

http://ei.yale.edu/what-we-do/emotion-revolution-educator/



Michael+Reichert+book.jpg

Radical Resilience: Comedian Katie Goodman on the Power of Improv to Come Up With Radical Ideas

LISTEN ON: APPLE PODCASTS | STITCHER | PANDORA | SPOTIFY | NPR ONE | MORE

This season I’m introducing you to the radical geniuses who are reshaping the systems as we know them. But according to today’s guest, we can all be radical geniuses by embracing a mindset of flexibility and resilience.

Katie Goodman is a professional improviser and a comedian. Over the last twenty years her team has taught about 10,000 people from individuals to corporate groups how to use the tools of improv comedy in everyday life.

Today, we’ll talk about how the powers of imagination, collaboration and “yes, and” can give us a new way of responding to problems the world throws at us.  

Find Katie Goodman’s 8 Tools of Improv and her podcast, “The Improvised Life with Katie Goodman” here.

Support the production of Inflection Point with a monthly or one-time contribution!

And when you’re done, come on over to The Inflection Point Society, our Facebook group of everyday activists who seek to make extraordinary change through small, daily actions.

Screen+Shot+2019-02-12+at+9.03.14+PM.jpg



“There is no peak fury”: Rebecca Traister, Author of Good And Mad: The Revolutionary Power Of Women’s Anger

There’s a reason that women are angry. Since the founding of this country, we have been faced with men in power who are set on shutting us down, and shutting us out. Revolutionary fury isn’t just for the founding fathers, and ladies, even though we’ve been stewing in our ever-growing anger for the past 242 years, we have just begun to fight. Find out how women have harnessed their anger throughout history and how when we listen to the stories behind each other's anger, we can all change the world today. Listen to my conversation with Rebecca Traister, the author of New York Times Bestseller, Good and Mad: The Revolutionary Power of Women’s Anger.

This conversation was recorded live in Berkeley, CA on October 10th, 2018 as part of Women Lit, in collaboration with the Bay Area Book Festival.

Photo by: One World Journalist

Photo by: One World Journalist

A Boardroom of Our Own: Julia Rhodes Davis on All-Women Spaces and The Future of AI

Ask any woman who’s sat through a long meeting surrounded by men, and she could tell you how exhausting it can be: we struggle to make ourselves heard while carefully avoiding accusations of being ‘bitchy,’ ‘strident,’ or ‘shrill.’ We rarely have the kind of permission to fail that our male counterparts get. We want to take ownership of what little power is tossed our way, yet we’re always at risk of being punished for wielding such power.  


Which is why Julia Rhodes Davis decided to form an all-women board for the non-profit, Vote.org. The question is, can the empowerment that takes place in an all-women board meeting translate into actual, world-changing power once they step outside the boardroom?

Find out what Julia has to say about turning empowerment into power, and also shaping the future so women and minorities don’t need to be “empowered” anymore.

Listen to my conversation with Julia Rhodes, Chair of Vote.org and Director of Partnerships at The Partnership on AI in the latest episode of Inflection Point.

Screen+Shot+2018-09-12+at+8.43.36+AM.jpg

TRANSCRIPT

Lauren Schiller:                  Women are banding together in ways we haven't seen since the feminist revolution of the 1970s. The Women's March, the #MeToo movement. More women than ever are running for office and actually winning elections. There are girls-only engineering camps, girls-only maker camps, girls-only afterschool clubs, and they're growing like crazy. So it would seem to be an incredibly empowering time for women. But there's the trendiness factor. The word "feminist" on every other t-shirt in yoga class, "Like a girl" and "nasty woman" have become marketable catchphrases on Nike ads and sanitary pads and coffee mugs. I mean, I love it, but is that mug really going to get you promoted? Because there's one question that has been bothering me: "Does all this empowerment equal power?"

Lauren Schiller:                  I thought one good place to start to understand this would be to look at the boardroom. That's a consolidation of power if ever there were one. As the chair of the board of Vote.org, Julia Rhodes Davis was empowered to decide who to include on that board. With her CEO, also a woman, they made a conscious decision to only appoint women. I wanted to know why and what it was actually doing for them.

Lauren Schiller:                  But first, let's take a closer look at this trend of all-girl and all-women spaces.

Julia R Davis:                        I think that all-women spaces could be seen as sort of incubators. In other words, incubators or startups or whatever are these places that foster early-stage ideas and provide extra resourcing around the things that are most vulnerable at startups like infrastructure and funding and access to networks and access to know-how. I think that when you think about all-women spaces in a similar way, it's not that we're going to stay in all-women spaces, to your point, but I think especially for younger women and girls there's so much risk taking and failure that comes with learning, especially in sort of the early pursuit of anything. When the world is conditioning young women to be afraid of failure because our worth is attached to our achievement and, by the way, also our appearance and so forth and so on, it's really existentially unsafe for us to fail. I think that that's a huge loss.

Julia R Davis:                        There's actually an amazing ... the founder of Girls Who Code, Reshma Saujani gives a beautiful TED Talk to this idea that we need to create spaces that are safe for girls to fail, because that's actually how you become an entrepreneur and how you become successful.

Lauren Schiller:                  She's actually been a guest on this show.

Julia R Davis:                        Oh, amazing. Well done.

Lauren Schiller:                  Yeah, and we do talk about that. So it sounds like you're in the camp of, "Women-only spaces can be a place where we can learn to navigate the "real-word" having gathered our strength and gone out there to make things happen." But do you think it actually is a way of solving gender inequality?

Julia R Davis:                        I think it depends on your timeframe. Here I would really sort of look at how power operates. Right? Let's take a few examples. There are right now, or actually I guess this stat is from 2016 from Time Magazine. 77% of all elected officials in the US are mail, 23% are female. So until we're starting to approach parity in terms of a representative government, I am all for as many organizations as possible working on the issue of bringing more women into public office. I think, similarly, if we look at who's writing political checks right now, 80% of political donors, 80% of all dollars political donations are written by men. That means that essentially ... I mean, that just points to how power is going to operate. So I would push for getting as many women to become political donors as possible to shift that power dynamic.

Julia R Davis:                        Then, you look at nonprofit boards. 80% of nonprofit board members are men. So until we shift that dynamic I am all for going in the opposite direction and really taking an exceptional tact to get exceptional results.

Lauren Schiller:                  What would you see in this polarized time as the role of women-only spaces?

Julia R Davis:                        I'm not sure that the role has actually changed very much from the inception of at least women-created women-only spaces. What I mean by that is-

Lauren Schiller:                  That's such an important distinction, by the way, "women-created women-only spaces".

Julia R Davis:                        Yeah. I mean, the paternalism of men creating women-only spaces is a whole different topic. Right?

Lauren Schiller:                  I hadn't actually thought about it in different terms than "women-created". Yeah, that's so interesting.

Julia R Davis:                        Well, because I actually don't know the founding history of, for example ... my first attempt at college was Mount Holyoke College, which was an all-women's school. It is a very small liberal arts school in western Massachusetts. I had grown up in New York City and I showed up and there were more rules and oversight at college than I had in my parents' home in New York City.

Julia R Davis:                        My parents were neither really conservative in terms of minding my time, nor were they extremely permissive. They were somewhere in the middle. When I really unpacked the Mount Holyoke experience and ultimately why it was not a good fit for me, there was a paternalism that was claimed by the administration of the school, as though we as a school of young women couldn't, individually young women, couldn't possibly make decisions for ourselves that would keep us safe and happy and well, which I just reject outright.

Julia R Davis:                        Anyway, that's just a little bit of a tangent on that.

Lauren Schiller:                  Well, no, but you obviously didn't know that before you started classes. What was your expectation and hopes for why you would go to an all-women's college?

Julia R Davis:                        Yeah, thanks. I think people tout that there's a freedom in an all-female classroom, for example, for women to find their voice and, to be honest, in a lot of ways I didn't have much trouble finding my voice. I probably often have too loud a voice. Although, put me in a room where I feel intimidated and all of a sudden that changes a lot, or certainly when I was younger it changed a lot. So I think I went for the promise of kind of the freedom of finding my voice and not having to fight for a voice in the classroom or fight for attention of advisors to pursue special projects or whatever the case may be. Because I do think that oftentimes women and men compete differently. I think when you put a group of women together, even if it's a competitive environment, if the rules of the game are not prescribed by sort of a masculine framework of power, you often find collaboration.

Julia R Davis:                        You'll get a winner at the end, some woman will rise to the top, but there's probably a lot more collaboration to get to the top than if you're in a situation where the only way is to compete and dominate those around. And, you know, obviously that's an over generalization. But I think that's one of the things at play.

Lauren Schiller:                  So your hope was that by going to an all-women college that you would eliminate all of those variables?

Julia R Davis:                        Yeah, totally. Because, I will say I went to an all-girl summer camp for 10 years, first as a camper and then as a staff member. It was so liberating. I mean, it was an extraordinary experience of finding myself and figuring out how to be in the world in a way that I could feel good about. Yeah, there were no men there, no boys there. It was a really free experience.

Lauren Schiller:                  Mount Holyoke, where Julia Rhodes Davis went to school briefly, was the first of the Seven Sisters All-Women's Colleges, which have collectively produced some of the most influential women of our time. Here's seven of them: Emily Dickinson, Grace Hopper, Jane Fonda, Hillary Clinton, Gloria Steinem, Helen Keller, and Zora Neale Hurston. I myself went to Vassar, but as one school t-shirt proclaims, 1969 was the year Vassar switched position, meaning they let guys in by the time I went there.

Lauren Schiller:                  But before that, in 1837, starting with Mount Holyoke, women's colleges were created because women weren't allowed to learn or be leaders in the same spaces as men. Since the founding of the Seven Sisters, families whose names were on buildings and museums sent their daughters to these schools, not necessarily to empower them, but to wrap them in the safety of high society. The plan was for white women who had means to go to school, meet well-connected friends and find a suitable husband from Harvard or Yale, you know, that MRS degree.

Lauren Schiller:                  It took 181 years to get from Mount Holyoke to the first female presidential candidate to be nominated by a major party. And, well, you know how that turned out. Julia Rhodes Davis, as chair of the board at Vote.org, is working to ensure that everyone is being represented at the ballot box and in the boardroom.

Lauren Schiller:                  Tell me about Vote.org. What do they do? Then let's talk about their board.

Julia R Davis:                        Vote.org is a nonprofit, nonpartisan 501(c)(3) organization that seeks to bring about reflective democracy wherein the electorate matches the population. We do that through making it easier to vote, period. We have programs that are focused on leveraging technology as much as possible to do really high-impact Get Out the Vote campaigns and have a number of other programs that are sort of longer-lead focused.

Julia R Davis:                        One of the reasons we don't have electronic or online voter registration in most states in this country has a lot to do with sort of antiquated voter registration laws that, unlike a lot of other voter suppression activities, these are not actually insidiously antiquated, they just are literally antiquated. So over the course of the next several years we're focused on working with secretaries of state to shift those laws. But in the interim it's really about focusing on who's not getting to the polls and why, and taking a double-down effort to get them there.

Lauren Schiller:                  So as far as your role at Vote.org, you're the chair of the board and you had an opportunity recently to reshape what that board looks like and who was on it. Tell me what you did and why in terms of the makeup of that board.

Julia R Davis:                        I think at Vote.org the commitment is really to exceptional results. So we kind of look across the board at, "Well, what's the status quo or what are the norms in this space and how can we think and do differently?" So when it came to board composition, when you look at the fact that 80% of nonprofit board members are male, well, let's be exceptional there and create an all-female board.

Julia R Davis:                        Will this be in perpetuity? I don't know. But for right now it's working really, really well. We convene the new board in January of this year and it's a small board that are all female. We spent 10 hours in a room together doing all kinds of planning and thinking and debating and so forth, and then we had a dinner that followed on. At the end of it I reflected with a colleague, a fellow board member, "You know, normally at the end of any board meeting, whether I'm on the board or on the staff serving the board, I'm exhausted. This time I'm energized. What's the difference?" It took me a beat to realize that not having to facilitate and manage around gender politics in a boardroom was a very liberating experience.

Julia R Davis:                        So back to the idea of the incubator, the all-women spaces and incubator. Just having that experience and that awareness gave me tools to start looking at other boardrooms that I participate in, for example, and helping to bring some leadership to, "Let's imagine if this looked different." Because I actually don't think that mixed-gender boardrooms are the wrong way to go necessarily. I do think that in general people need more self-awareness about how they show up in a room. So whether you're a man who doesn't necessarily have self-awareness about talking over others or taking credit for other people's ideas, or you're a woman who perhaps doesn't listen very well. I think being in a space where we didn't have to spend a lot of energy making sure that all the voices were heard and so forth and so on, because there was just a more natural flow. It gave me a sense of what's possible. So experiencing the art of the possible in one space can actually help to bring examples of making that a possibility in other spaces.

Lauren Schiller:                  I mean, I'm trying to imagine if the chair of a board of, just pick any other organization, was like, "You know what? We're going to make this board all men." Which is happening, obviously. It's 80%.

Julia R Davis:                        I mean, it has been the norm forever.

Lauren Schiller:                  Right. Exactly. I mean, have you received any backlash for making this decision [crosstalk 00:16:56]?

Julia R Davis:                        I'm sure I will now that I've been on a podcast talking about it. We have not received to date any backlash, and the men that were on our board prior to this cycle were extremely supportive of the idea, so I will say that.

Julia R Davis:                        I think that we have to look at these things in a more global context. This sort of comes back to how I was talking about kind of the power analysis. So if men were marginalized, men would need all-men spaces, but they're not marginalized. Every system of power in place right now is still designed with the benefit of men. So until that's different, this is not a one-to-one comparison. Women need to build power to create a more equal society. Until that's not a need, I think all-women spaces are completely justified as one way towards that end.

Lauren Schiller:                  So thinking about the Vote.org all-female board as this sort of incubator idea, a testing ground and a place for new ideas to proliferate, both inside the board and out into the world, have you set sort of a success metric in terms of, is it working, when do you reevaluate, what happens next?

Julia R Davis:                        So there's a sort of goal-setting framework that's pretty common in tech or tech-inspired organizations, the OKR: Objectives and Key Results framework. So we're developing actual metrics for board performance. I think that that is the place where we'll look to first to see if we're making progress.

Julia R Davis:                        If you're asking is there a point at which we're going to say this all-female board thing was a success or a failure, I mean, I suppose that's an important question for us to be asking, but I think it's pretty early days for us to be framing it up that way.

Lauren Schiller:                  Yeah, or whether you want to ... if you have a seat open up, whether you're going to continue to look specifically for women, or-

Julia R Davis:                        Oh, we will. I would say for the foreseeable future, but definitely through 2020. I think it's too short a timeframe to expect to see any significant results being a two-year-old organization.

Lauren Schiller:                  Julia's feeling optimistic about her all-female board and I can see why. More women-only spaces are popping up so fast it's hard to keep tracking: women's coworking spaces, event spaces, gyms, networking organizations. In New York The Wing and [Cubby 00:19:44] Club, in San Francisco The Ruby and The Assembly. And while some are quietly growing their member base, others are getting admonished. The Wing for not being in compliance with New York's public accommodation law; a law ironically created to further gender equality. And remember when the Alamo Drafthouse in Austin announced it would host two Wonder Woman screenings where no men were allowed at its downtown location? They were accused of violating city equality laws. But as Glynnis MacNicol, cofounder of The List, a network and visibility platform for professional women from all industries, told the male host of the Story in a Bottle podcast, "As a man that has access to every place, why is it a problem to allow women a safe space?"

Lauren Schiller:                  I brought Julia in to talk with me about the Vote.org all-female board and women-only spaces in general. But she also recently took a job at the Partnership on AI for the Benefit of the People and Society. That's the full name of the organization.

Lauren Schiller:                  We've all heard that insidious things like bias and tribalism can be perpetuated by artificial intelligence, but if you've got someone like Julia empowered who applies an equity lens to everything she does, could that actually shift the power dynamic?

Lauren Schiller:                  But first, don't forget to hit that subscribe button. I'm Lauren Schiller. This is Inflection Point. We'll be right back.

Lauren Schiller:                  It's time for a shout-out to Care/of for supporting this show. What is Care/of, you might ask? It's a monthly subscription vitamin service that delivers completely personalized vitamin and supplement packs, right to your door. The vitamin aisle is overwhelming, but there's an easier way to figure out what's right for you. I took Care/of's online quiz, which asks you about your diet, health goals and lifestyle choices to find out what vitamins and supplements you specifically need. It only takes five minutes. For me, I wanted to get more sleep, give my nails a chance to get stronger, and have more energy. They account for all of that. Then, your vitamins get delivered right to your door in personalized, easy-to-remember, daily packs, perfect for a busy on-the-go lifestyle. And, your monthly subscription box can be easily modified at any time.

Lauren Schiller:                  When they arrive, it's so great. The Care/of packs have your name on them, and a little bit of inspiration to start your day. For 25% off your first month of personalized Care/of vitamins, visit TakeCareOf.com and enter "Inflection". That's TakeCareOf.com and enter "Inflection", for 25% off your first month of personalized Care/of vitamins.

Lauren Schiller:                  I'm Lauren Schiller and this is inflection point. I'm talking with Julia Rhodes Davis, the chair of the board of Vote.org and director of partnerships at the Partnership on AI.

Lauren Schiller:                  So, Julia, what is the Partnership on AI?

Julia R Davis:                        The organization is really ... it's a multi-stakeholder membership organization, which really means that it has representatives from corporations and from civil society, from academic research institutions and others, all of whom are working together to really shape the future of artificial intelligence. From my perspective, this is really the frontier of society. There's so much we don't know, and I think early indications of the impact that technology can have on society suggests that we're in for a ride and we really do need to play a more proactive role in informing and designing technology so that it does benefit people and does as little harm as possible, I guess is the way I can say that.

Lauren Schiller:                  So when you said there's already been some indications that there could potentially be harm, are you thinking of a specific example?

Julia R Davis:                        I mean, you could really point to our current democracy in the United States as an example of at least technology broadly that is in some ways supported by aspects of AI technology. I mean, Facebook was used as a platform and by a foreign power to influence our Democratic election in 2016. That is a pretty significant thing that's happened.

Julia R Davis:                        I think that there are a lot of questions in general right now about, you know, for an organization or company who has previously thought of itself as this neutral utility of being a platform to connect people when it can be used for such insidious ends, what is the responsibility of that company to mitigate that risk? I think that's an extremely important question that should be extrapolated to the entire technology industry and to those of us in and around it. What are our responsibilities to society at large?

Lauren Schiller:                  Can you define artificial intelligence? I mean, is it always some sort of human manifestation or human impersonation? What is it?

Julia R Davis:                        That's a great question and you'll get a million different answers to it depending on who you ask. I think first of all it's worth noting I don't have a technical background. I came into this sort of intersection of technology and society in my career about five years ago and have increased my knowledge hundredsfold as a result of working closely with technologists. So I have a different answer than someone who, say, got a PhD in computer science. But in general, this is a very broad term that I think now media has even further muddied the waters generally, because a lot of folks don't understand the technology, so they're trying to put words to it that don't necessarily get us very far in terms of understanding.

Julia R Davis:                        I think it's an umbrella term that really speaks to sort of making machines more intelligent. What I mean by that is, I think in its very basic sense, a computer that can run a program that has some similarities to a decision-making process could be considered artificial intelligence. So, in fact, your entire smartphone runs on all kinds of "artificial intelligence". Really what that means is there are a number of decision trees that are programmed into the different applications on your phone. The thing that supercharges this technology is that much of these formulas or algorithms as they're known in technical parlance actually adapt over time.

Julia R Davis:                        I think one thing for everyone to understand about AI is this is not a fixed too. So unlike a hammer and a nail, they are a hammer and a nail and you really can't change their form very easily. When you're a user of a smartphone or a user of any kind of AI technology at all, your use of that technology actually changes how that technology operates. So we have this iterative relationship with technology that I think few users understand. I think we should all feel more empowered by that, actually.

Julia R Davis:                        When you choose to use Facebook in a particular way to click on an ad or not, you're actually informing Facebook in the future of how it should relate to you. That can sound scary, but I also think it can sound really empowering and I think that the latter is a better relationship that we should start to cultivate with our technology if we're going to have a better future around it.

Lauren Schiller:                  The thing that I'm trying to understand about the role of AI in the human world and how humans are already interacting with each other is how whoever is sort of setting this technology loose influences the way that it interacts with the world and how that might either magnify or reduce the bias that is already in the world, be it racial, gender, pick one.

Julia R Davis:                        Yeah. So this is a huge topic and a really important one.

Lauren Schiller:                  We're going to solve it today, Julia.

Julia R Davis:                        Yes, please. There are a lot of efforts in the technical community to mitigate and solve for the ways in which data carries bias and can further bias algorithms and therefore technology systems. There are unbelievable examples of early apps that were ... I think there was a health app that was put out early on that had been built entirely by a male engineering team and had zero acknowledgement of menstruation as a regular part of the health that women experience on a monthly, daily basis. So those oversights are sort of the most obvious examples of the ways in which who builds the technology and how they think and who's around the table really informs society.

Julia R Davis:                        I think that we have to think about it in a number of different ways. I actually am really excited about my work at Partnership on AI, because there is a deep recognition on the part of the organization that we have to have a diverse set of voices and stakeholders around the table when we are making decisions about what this technology is going to do and how it's built and designed and so forth.

Julia R Davis:                        I think that there's a long way to go in terms of being able to sort of have more practical ways that engineers in a room can kind of have a checklist that helps them recognize where their own biases might be and how to mitigate them in a technical capacity.

Julia R Davis:                        Then, there's a whole body of work around the pipeline issue and the fact that you have far fewer women in STEM, and though that's changing over time, I think it's a slow process. You have a far fewer number of people of color in STEM as well for all kinds of reasons. So there are many, many efforts to address these different ways in which bias can show up in technology. I think it's important for technology creators to bridge the gap, to sort of shift the systemic issues that contribute to the fact that most technologists are male, for example. That's going to take time. So what do we do in the interim and what are the incentives that we have at our fingertips to kind of shift that landscape?

Lauren Schiller:                  Man. It seems like with every new innovation it's an opportunity to get ahead, but it's also just this opportunity to just make it worse.

Julia R Davis:                        Yeah. I heard a really compelling conversation between Reid Hoffman, founder of LinkedIn, partner at Greylock, et cetera, I think most people know who he is, and Kara Swisher, who's a really fantastic media editor, I guess, and host of the Recode podcast. They were in a public conversation at a conference in San Francisco and they ... Kara was really pressing Reid on, "Why is it that tech companies so often fail to identify unintended consequences and address them before they become the problematic unintended consequences of, say, an intervened election or something like that?"

Julia R Davis:                        Reid's response, it's on the record, is, "When you have a homogenous group of young, largely white, regularly affluently-raised men around a table building a product, this is a group of people who haven't lost very much in their lives, so they're not all that familiar with what it looks like to be on the losing end of an unintended consequence." I mean, that has just sat with me at the front of my mind ever since I heard that conversation. I mean, it certainly speaks to something I've believed for a long time, but to hear it from Reid Hoffman sort of put some teeth to it in a way.

Julia R Davis:                        I think that that should be reason enough to really push for more diverse rooms, whether it's the engineering room as it were, or the boardroom.

Lauren Schiller:                  We need AI to recognize all different kinds of people right now, but we don't have people working on AI that recognize all kinds of different people right now. So how do we get where we need to be, given where we are in this moment? How does your equity lens that you put on everything you see tie into the work that you're doing with Partnership on AI?

Julia R Davis:                        I think that there's two angles to an answer, or there are two different kinds of answers here, one of which I can speak to more directly and one of which is worth mentioning that it's worthy work that other people are doing.

Julia R Davis:                        Representation among engineers matters tremendously if we are going to solve for a more, both inclusively designed and inclusively executed, if you will, technology. The issues of getting more women into technology spaces is huge and I think that there are a number of incredible organizations focused on that and we need to proliferate those efforts across the board. This has to be a serious focus of every technology company, of every academic institution, of ever undergraduate program, et cetera. So that's a huge undertaking that I fully support and I'm so grateful for people who dedicate their work to that.

Julia R Davis:                        At Partnership on AI, I am looking at this question right now in terms of who is our current membership. We have just over 70 members currently and they represent corporations, they represent think tanks, they represent academic labs, research labs, also human rights organizations, advocacy organizations. There's more representation from some parts of sectors and less from others. There are certain constituents who are more and less represented. So I'm very actively trying to understand whose voice is at the table and whose voice is missing and how do we balance who's around the table. That's really at the forefront of my mind in day eight of my job as the director of partnerships.

Julia R Davis:                        We have an institutional commitment, both in terms of our executive director, Terah Lyons, who comes out of the Obama White House, as well as our board to really make sure that our multi-stakeholder organization is representative of and represented by a diverse set of stakeholders, and more to come on that. I think we're doing a good job and I think there's more improvements that we can make in terms of, you know, to get back to sort of the impetus for the question, "How do we make sure that AI is built for and by everyone?"

Lauren Schiller:                  Most of us move through the world with blind spots. Those blind spots are typically created where we grew up and by the stories we were told. Julie Rhodes Davis seems to be called to make places of power blind-spot-free so everyone's story is represented. Where did her obsession with representation come from?

Julia R Davis:                        I come from a long line of change-makers, especially on my mother's side of the family. My mother's family is from North Carolina. Back in the turn of the 20th Century, my great grandfather was one of the leaders around opening the first school for black children in Pender County, North Carolina. And as a result, my grandmother, his daughter, grew up with the Ku Klux Klan regularly visiting the house to intimidate the family, my family, and to try to get them to close the school down.

Julia R Davis:                        Family story goes, you know, hard to fact check this one, but my great-grandfather would regularly go out and meet the Klan and just stand there with actually a shotgun in his hand and just acknowledge them but not kowtow. The line was, "I'll see you in church on Sunday."

Julia R Davis:                        That translated to my grandmother and grandfather participating a lot in Civil Rights marches in Louisville, Kentucky where they raised their family and where my mother grew up. My mother has gone on to build a really impressive institution that trains progressive religious leaders to help bring about a more just and equitable society.

Lauren Schiller:                  What's it called?

Julia R Davis:                        Auburn Seminary. So with that background, you wonder where does technology fit in.

Lauren Schiller:                  Well, even before we get to where does technology fit in ... I mean, as far as you growing up, and that's obviously ... it's sort of baked into your growing up experience and the stories of your family and stuff like that, but have you personally experienced your own ... I mean, you're a white woman, but have you experienced your own inequity or anything you'd care to share that might also have influenced your trajectory? Like the first time you were like, "Hey, that's not fair."

Julia R Davis:                        I wish I could remember the first time. I mean, I think the most ... I mean, first of all, I remember seeing a movie, I think I was probably seven or eight years old, I can't really remember. It was called Class Action. I said to my parents, "I want to be a litigator," once I saw that movie. So I think very early on I kind of understood that there was a way in which standing up for what's right and being a precocious young person and girl was somehow subversive.

Julia R Davis:                        I was really politicized really early. I mean, I remember Clinton and Bush running against each other and really feeling very strongly that Bill Clinton should win the election, and I was relatively young. So certainly I was aware of politics, I felt sort of engaged by politics, I was writing current even articles in the seventh grade about politics. I think abortion actually ... abortion access was the first issue that really hit home for me, just in that I remember hearing male relatives speaking about abortion access as though they had any right to any opinion whatsoever. I remember being at a family function and I was probably 16 or 17 years old, talking to 10 fully grown male uncles and grandfather, all of whom were anti-choice, and basically just holding the line and arguing sort of every angle of the point, but ultimately, not willing to see ground around reproductive rights.

Lauren Schiller:                  How did you handle that?

Julia R Davis:                        You know, righteous anger is a good thing, Lauren. I mean, I think on some level I do feel in my bones what is right. Bodily autonomy is something that we all need. It is a human right. The fact that there are women in this country and around this globe who literally every day do not have full control over their bodies is unreal. It's a horrifying thing.

Lauren Schiller:                  Since you brought up abortion and pro-choice/anti-choice, are your parents ... are you guys in the same camp?

Julia R Davis:                        Oh hell yeah.

Lauren Schiller:                  Okay. It's just the uncles. It's always the uncles.

Julia R Davis:                        Exactly. Again this is why I sort of put it in the frame of bodily autonomy. The my mind, the political issue is about controlling women. It has nothing to do, really, with the individual case or what is claimed.

Lauren Schiller:                  I probably should know what this means, but what does it mean to pray with your feet?

Julia R Davis:                        Oh, it's shorthand, I think, for the behaviors we engage in. How we show up in the world I think is the evidence for our beliefs. So if you believe in justice and equality for all, what are you doing to, in the real world, to bring those beliefs about? Quite frankly, if you are pro-life, what are you doing to live that value?

Julia R Davis:                        I mean, this is where I think language really matters. The religious right, the conservative right that sort of started in the Reagan era and built power through Jerry Falwell's church and so forth, they did a masterful job of claiming language. But if you don't stand up for people on death row who have not gotten a fair trial and who are there because of racism and because of xenophobia, that is not pro-life to me. If you put the life of a woman behind a nonentity, that's not pro-life to me either. Quite frankly, if you put your ... let's go down the list, and there are much more articulate people than I on this subject, but the effects of climate change ... is killing our planet and really changing the course of the lives of our collective children. The right has done nothing to preserve life in that regard.

Lauren Schiller:                  I'd love to know what the best advice that you've ever been given is about how to find and be your authentic self.

Julia R Davis:                        You know what's interesting? I've gotten unbelievable amounts of wonderful, wise advice over the years. I've had an incredible access to women of all ages who've played tremendous roles in terms of mentorship and advice-giving and wisdom, both in sort of more formal settings and also just friends around the dinner table.

Julia R Davis:                        At the end of the day, the thing I've learned, it's not someone else's advice, the thing I've learned is any amount of advice is only as good as how much work you're willing to do yourself; how much work I've been willing to do myself. I think everybody's sort of demons are different in a way, but I guess my take on that is you have to find ways to internalize your wins and really fundamentally believe that you are enough just the way you are.

Lauren Schiller:                  Julia Rhodes Davis created her own all-woman space in the boardroom for Vote.org and is willing to give it some time to see if it not only feels good, it does good. As the director of partnerships for the Partnership on AI, Julie is making sure diverse voices are at the table when it comes to who and what technology is used for.

Lauren Schiller:                  I want to hear your stories of how empowerment has led to power. Tell us about a moment when you were empowered by going to our Facebook group, The Inflection Point Society, or go to InflectionPointSociety.org. I'm Lauren Schiller and this is Inflection Point.

Lauren Schiller:                  That's our Inflection Point for today. All of our episodes are on Apple Podcasts, RadioPublic, Stitcher and NPR One. Give us a five-star review and subscribe to the podcast. Know a woman with a great rising-up story? Let us know at InflectionPointRadio.org. While you're there, I invite you to support Inflection Point with a monthly or a one-time contribution. Your support keeps women's stories front and center. Just go to InflectionPointRadio.org.

Lauren Schiller:                  We're on Facebook at Inflection Point Radio. Follow us and follow me on Twitter @laschiller. To find out more about the guests you heard today and to sign up for our email newsletter, you know where to go: InflectionPointRadio.org.

Lauren Schiller:                  Inflection Point is produced in partnership with KALW 91.7 FM in San Francisco and PRX. Our story editor and content manager is Alaura Weaver. Our engineer and producer is Eric Wayne. I'm your host, Lauren Schiller.

Speaker 3:                              Support for this podcast comes from the Corporation For Public Broadcasting.

Speaker 4:                              From PRX.

 

How To Find Joy In The Resistance - Paola Mendoza and Sarah Sophie Flicker, Women's March Organizers

As national organizers for The Women’s March and leaders of The Resistance Revival Chorus, artist activists Paola Mendoza and Sarah Sophie Flicker see their purpose as connecting fellow members of The Resistance to the moments of joy and transcendence that come with being a part of history in the making. They walk in the footsteps of the Nina Simone’s and Joan Baez’s and Aretha Franklin’s of the world--the artists who helped to fuel the Civil Rights movement by nourishing the souls of the people who marched for freedom.

And if there was ever a time when we need to consistently keep our souls replenished for the fight against injustice, it would be now.

Hear how Paola Mendoza and Sarah Sophie Flicker use the power of art and culture in activism, what they learned in documenting The Women’s March for the newly released book, Together We Rise, and how you can participate in the 2018 Women's March.

And tell us how you found your voice in 2017 and what you are going to do with it in 2018, on our Facebook page!

Paola Mendoza and Sarah Sophie Flicker, photo by Guy Murrow

Paola Mendoza and Sarah Sophie Flicker, photo by Guy Murrow

How To End Structural Racism in Tech-Laura Weidman Powers, Code2040

Why does the next civil rights movement involve people of color breaking into tech? Laura Weidman Powers, co-founder and CEO of Code2040, talks income inequality, how the jobs future is wrapped up with the tech industry, and how to keep things in perspective while fighting structural racism. Weidman-Powers is working to smooth the pathways for entrepreneurs of color, and in turn to give communities of color a place in the tech-driven economy.